New look for RFF

[Rodinal Addict]

Please, O PLeease don't change. I'm an Apple guy, and that new proposed site even repulses me. Current site is good because it's easier on the eyes, and its almost a trademark look.

 

[pesphoto]

Thanks Jorge. You'll make us a happy bunch O photogs,

 

[ddutchison]

Thanks Jorge, Really, the place looks great.

 

[dcsang]

Thanks but no thanks Jorge 🙂

If it ain't broke... don't fix it 😀

The site is fine as is 🙂 imho

Cheers
Dave

 

[Jerevan]

I have to say no, no, no! 😀 I think the current layout is very nice and easy on the eyes. Someone may say it's dull and grey, but it works very well for example in the gallery. It's got class, ya know. 😉

 

[flashover]

I loged into DSLR Thrus night as I hadn't been there in a week or so and WOW I thought I was on the wrong page. Kept hitting the bookmark to get the right page. Now My eyes hurt.

 

[jaapv]

The new look is somewhat cleaner, but I think the original is more - ah- distinctive. The light blue and white is more run-of-the-mill. There are dozens of formus and sites like that.

 

[Max Power]

Stay with the present look. The 'new' look linked to the DSLR exchange looks kinda, well, cheap. (Sorry).

The present look of the RFF is easy on the eyes, easy to navigate and not so agressive. It looks distinctive and dignified as well.

Just MHO,
Kent

 

[c.poulton]

wow !!!! i better not touch this site. I need to upgrade VB but will retain the original theme.

Thanks Jorge... 🙂 🙂 🙂

 

[visiondr]

Ugh, please, PLEASE do not make RFF look like that. I will agree that RFF is a bit cluttered but it please do not mess with the color scheme.

Aye, Aye... cut the clutter and keep the colour as is.

Ron

 

[picturetaker]

New look seems to be hard on my 56 yr old lookers. Sure like the way it looks now.....

 

[Gabriel M.A.]

Ach!! My eyes!

I mean. err... This look's good. It's good this one we currently have.

 

[Swann]

I remember with horror the last changes here in RFF. Downtimes... instabilities ... endless fiddling... etc. etc. and I lately said to myself; RF-Forum works so well and smooth at the moment, the next change can't be far.
Why not just keeping a gallery/forum that works nice and looks nice? It is the content that counts not the look.
Worried regards
Swann

 

[Dougg]

Being a Mac guy from the start, I do appreciate dark text on light background... like a book or magazine, etc. But graphics definitely benefit from a dark background like RFF has now. I don't mind the "retro" look of the white text on dark-grey, rather elegant I think, and all in all I prefer the current RFF colors and layout. At DSLRX I particularly dislike the blue text on white. One more vote for the status quo! 🙂

 

[MP Guy]

dont worry it stays the way it is 🙂

 

[nomade]

Although i'd lvoe a newlook for the site, but no this one looks a lot better to me, but hey i like the new banner 🙂

 

[smdeep]

Hi Jorge
I am 42 and RFF is the easiest on my eyes. Please dont change the colours at least.

Sudeep

 

[Buze]

Now, speaking of RFF software, whats up with the broken classified "featured" banner ? It shows random classified, mostly /all sold/ items.

 

[ghost]

i'd change the color of links so they're more distinct in the midst of text, but that's it.

 

[nico]

wow !!!! i better not touch this site. I need to upgrade VB but will retain the original theme.



Thanks Jorge!🙂
Bye
Nico