jackal2513
richbroadbent
What about the cat?
/T
the cat ? what about it
where is the shot taken before the 2.0 update
you cant say anything about the cat unless we see that
What about the cat?
/T
and you didn't post anything to prove your point why?
Sorry to be rude about it, but put up or shut up...i'm a little sick of people bashing this camera when there's evidence to the contrary just a few posts prior.
I'll be happy to wait for others to try it out first 🙂 especially if reverting back to the previous firmware is a big no go...
this can't be... the m8 has crappy high iso performance according to all the internet critics?!? could they be incorrect?🙄
Strange, but I have another result...
People forget to apply basic color, not luminance correction when handling RAW files. If I apply the same (or virtually the same) contrast, saturation, and color & luminance noise reduction settings for an M8 DNG file that I would for a RAW Canon 5D file, the M8 files are much cleaner than the 5D ones.
If you compare 5D JPEGs to M8 JPEGs, that's another story, and often will be disappointed. People forget that Canikon have their own version of "Photoshop" (to put it mildly and oversimplified). They have the room to add hardware in each model as needed. Cramming it in an M8 body is a completely different issue. That's why, in general, shooting DNG rather than JPEG is preferred with an M8.
Most people just want results now; for that, they should consider a Canon G9. Or G10, when it's in stores.
You made a theory out of a short message.
From what I read on another forum, I think it was Leica users forum, the new firmware allows auto ISO, the use of sdhc cards, a faster download speed, a higher capacity buffer, and some early adopters are reporting better looking high ISO pics and a cleaner jpg. There are some other rumored improvements but they have yet to be confirmed. Bob.
Hey! Don't get my cat involved in the whole M8 debate, he's very highly strung and may not talk to me for days if he hears you talking this way.
Admittedly, an oversight not to do comparative before and after, however - before I would not have posted even as a test as I found the high ISO shots completely unusuable.
Have you looked at you test shots on the computer or just on the cameras screen - there's a huge difference between the two as initially I thought there was no difference from the previous firmware update ( regarding ISO at least.)
ISO 2500
![]()
ISO 2500 at 100%
![]()
Here's some quick 'n' dirty jpegs straight out of the cam before and after:
Full picture
![]()
100% crop old firmware:
![]()
100% crop firmware 2.000:
![]()
Cheers,
Uwe