New photos by Summaron 35mm f2.8

[begona]

All taken with Ilford HP5+

 

[bizarrius]

with yellow filter? or not?
nice pictures btw

 

[begona]

no filter

 

[mfogiel]

There is something wrong with the processing - either overdevelopment or scanner clipping or both. This lens with this kind of film should deliver better tonality.

Summaron & Tri X

 

[begona]

I dont know what is wrong...maybe scanning..Iam not good at it..

Dev:

Microphen 20C 1:1 12min
Aggitation every 1 min..3-4 times invert tank in first 5 sec

What are yours "spec" for that photos?

 

[mfogiel]

The film after development should not be overly dense if you want to scan - the darkest parts should be somewhat transparent on a light table. Above all, you have to display a histogram in preview with your scanner, and make sure there is no highlight clipping. If this should be the case, try scanning as positive and invert later in PS.

 

[Rob-F]

Quoting mfogiel: "There is something wrong with the processing - either overdevelopment or scanner clipping or both. This lens with this kind of film should deliver better tonality.

Summaron & Tri X"

Actually, your look rather grainy for a small enlargement of Tri-X. I didn't think the OP's shots were all that bad. The one of the young girl looks spot-on. I could see where slight adjustments could be made in the future: a little more exposure to capture shadow, a little less development. But there's more right than wrong here. Great lens, that Summaron.

 

[jenhao]

Although Goran has some nice shots, I think he could have done something different to preserve a lot of the tones in his images. Large portions are simply blank. Not a criticism but I bet with a little tweaking, future images come closer to what B&W is capable of.

Keep experimenting

Mark

 

[SimonSawSunlight]

they look a little overprocessed indeed, but I've seen (and done ) much worse.

 

[CSG123]

I particularly like #2.