I'm pretty sure that the 'digital rangefinder' for this generation will be a mFT camera (Panasonic/Olympus) or the Samsung NX, or something else built along these lines. M-mount adapters aside, once you build a camera with an M-mount you're targeting a different class of users, and the phrase "affordable to the masses" does not come to mind.
Nothing against the masses, mind you - I'm one of them 😀 I can't afford or justify a new RD-1x, let alone an M8. I'd be happy spending ~ 1K on a digital camera with the characteristics of a classic rangefinder (excellent viewfinder, uncluttered controls, full manual control + focusing).
I concur.
I had posted thoughts on an uncluttered and full manual + focusing control RFd in other threads and invariably lit up a fire storm from "Defenders of the Faith".:bang: It seems chimping and studying histograms had become the new neurosis, much like worrying that the meter needle was not perfectly centered in yesteryear's.
Remembering how I got hooked on Nikon F2's almost 4 decades ago...and still is...there are merits in expandable or upgradable components. Buy what you can afford now and add more later. For example:
1. Sensor chips...up to full frame of course.
2. LCD...up to covering up the entire camera back, or
3. Wire connectible external units with storage [like a unit Epson offers];
4. Firmware...of course
5. Lens...absolutely...I own enough of them.
All the day-to-day external control one needs are:
A. White Balance...like selected film types of old;
B. ISO setting...plus Auto;
C. Shutter speed...plus AE and +/- EV bias;
D. Resolution...Raw, JPEG high or medium [SD chips are so cheap these days];
Once the camera is set up, all info one needs while shooting is:
exposure/battery remaining.
The RD-1 is an intelligent design, 6Mp notwithstanding. The price premium is merely prepaying film/processing for life.
😉
I would buy one if by 2010 Photokina time Zeiss still will not talk about a ZMd. Leica is hopeless.