New RF camera bags article over on photo.net

JoshRoot

JoshRoot

The NW will rise again.
Local time
9:01 AM
Joined
Jan 10, 2006
Messages
171
Nothing groundbreaking, just an article that looks at a bunch of bags that many of us use for RF (or small digital) kits.

http://photo.net/equipment/bags/small-bags

It's another one of my articles that got banished to the land of wind and ghosts for one reason or another. But now that I wield the UNIX of power, I can finally get them onto the site myself.

There haven't been issues in the past with mentioning photo.net here, and we've never minded anyone mentioning RFF over on PN. But if there is an admin issue with posting this, somebody please email me after it is deleted.
 
Well, I don't know about the "rules" but I see no point in pretending this is the only photo site on the internet.

Looks like a useful article. I skimmed it and noticed you reviewed a Crumpler bag. I have the 7 Million Dollar Home (in black!) and I love it. The only problem is that by the time you fill it with all your favorite goodies, it gets pretty heavy for a shoulder bag. I got it precisely because it does not look like a camera bag. I use it to carry an RF, two lenses, and a small film SLR with a usually 3 lenses, and there's room for my Holga, all kinds of little accessories, and film. It's more than anyone needs for a small digital or RF bag, but a DSLR kit will fill it up pretty quick.

Paul
 
photophorous said:
Well, I don't know about the "rules" but I see no point in pretending this is the only photo site on the internet.
Click to expand...

It's more professional politeness than anything. I am not a random user posting a link somewhere, I'm an administrator (and employee) of the website I am linking to.

But, like I said, it hasn't been a problem in the past.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't think it would be a problem here or on any other site. But admins of other sites have posted links on PN and had them removed.
 
Every situation, and every website, is different and will treat different links in various ways. One website might be fine to link to, one might be blocked because of past abuse issues, hence my note above. If Back Alley and the crew want to remove this post, they are well within their rights to do so and I have no problem with it.

That having been said, this really isn't the place to discuss admin action here or on photo.net. If you want to know the rules here, contact the admins here and I'm sure they will be happy to discuss it. If you want to know about photo.net, contact me at contact@photo.net and we can talk about the issue.

Otherwise let's just keep this thread to discussions of camera bags.
 
Good piece, Josh. One thing I've noticed about the Domke '803 is that the ballistic nylon version (the J-803) seems to be a little more spacious than the canvas version. I can stuff bigger magazines, or even a Thinkpad, into the slot on the back than with the canvas version, anyway. And it does deal with moisture a lot better, a nice feature with the winter we've been having in the NW.
 
Chuck Albertson said:
Good piece, Josh. One thing I've noticed about the Domke '803 is that the ballistic nylon version (the J-803) seems to be a little more spacious than the canvas version. I can stuff bigger magazines, or even a Thinkpad, into the slot on the back than with the canvas version, anyway. And it does deal with moisture a lot better, a nice feature with the winter we've been having in the NW.
Click to expand...

That would be a very nice feature, as the back pocket on the canvas 803 is VERY tight. Not much will fit back there at all.
 
JoshRoot said:
It's more professional politeness than anything. I am not a random user posting a link somewhere, I'm an administrator (and employee) of the website I am linking to.

But, like I said, it hasn't been a problem in the past.
Click to expand...

I think your professional politeness was a prudent approach. I was just expressing my own opinion on the topic, as it seems to be a sensitive one all around. I think it benefits everyone when different sites play well together, because no two are the same and the fact that I can look at all of them just makes me want to look (and participate) at all of them even more. :D

Paul
 
I love camera bags...I'm not above admitting that :D
Thanks for sharing!
I still have to order my Domke 5xb
 
A good roundup, Josh. Well written. One additional thing to consider (for some of us) is the weight of the bag, when empty. Some are darned heavy and when you add gear, they become fatiguing to carry. It's one of the reasons I rather like the plain-jane Lowepro Nova 2 bags for small kits -- the bags themselves are very lightweight. Of course they have the drawback of looking exactly like a camera bag :)

Gene
 
Nice article Josh. I tend to use my 803 most of the time, and it did start out as a bag for an iBook.

Another smaller sized bag, in addition to the little Domke 5xb, is the Kiesel cs300. I bought one and do like it. Easy to work out of and all that stuff. (LINK)
 
josh, no problem with a link.

now i need to go read the article because unlike jon, a new bag stirs my photo creativity...;)

joe
 
That Kiesel looks really, really nice. But black ... UGH! Why oh why do you want to keep a camera with film, plus unexposed rolls, in a heat sink? Winter no problem, but in summer? No way.

One of the reasons I like the Domke line is the choice of colour. The F6 is my preferred bag, though I don't like the front pocket much; the Kiesel arrangment seems preferable to me.
 
Last edited:
Could never understand why Domke discontinued making bags in gray. Even in the middle of the Nevada desert, gear stayed reasonably cool.
 
Hello my name is Jesse, and I'm a bagaholic...

I really try not to buy them, but I keep finding one thats just slightly bigger, smaller, nicer or cooler looking than the one I just bought. I'd feel really bad, but I DO actually use them all, they all have their purpose/season/special situation. My girlfreind once asked me why I have a closet full of bags and still insist on looking at new ones... so I asked her how many pairs of shoes, and how many purses she has in her closet... I dont get bothered about my bag habit anymore.

And it's totally true... each bag has a certain character that makes me feel a certain way as a photographer when I wear it. Its like the difference between leaving the house in the morning in a tux, overall's or a trench coat and fedora. It gives me a different sense of character and does somewhat influence how and what I take pictures of. I find I have a hard time gelling with street photography when I'm wearing my Lowepro backpack, just like I'd never take my unmarked faded and worn leather/canvas hip bag for a nature trek. I can fit roughly the same gear in each, but it just wouldnt work. You wouldnt feel right showing up to a day of farm work in that tux, would you?
 
Trius said:
... But black ... UGH! Why oh why do you want to keep a camera with film, plus unexposed rolls, in a heat sink? Winter no problem, but in summer? No way....
Click to expand...

But you know that black is so very slimming. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom