Slumgullion
Well-known
I have a 28/1.9. It doesn't have haze. I like its image quality quite a bit. Compared to modern Voigtlander lenses, the build quality is fine, but slightly more work-in-progress (the aperture detents feel too stiff and there is play in the guides). Its look is more 'medium contrast' with some SA wide-open...which isn't a bad thing. Distortion is low. Bokeh is very pleasant.
Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
House Plant by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
That being said, modern Voigtlander lenses just keep getting better and better. Build quality is exceptional. There is now a consistent focus on delivering high-performing lenses at a reasonable size (there are trade-offs that come with that as well). I assume that they worked out whatever issues they were having with balsam haze and chalk that up to unfortunate growing pains.
Jenny by Jim Fischer, on FlickrHouse Plant by Jim Fischer, on FlickrJenny by Jim Fischer, on FlickrThat being said, modern Voigtlander lenses just keep getting better and better. Build quality is exceptional. There is now a consistent focus on delivering high-performing lenses at a reasonable size (there are trade-offs that come with that as well). I assume that they worked out whatever issues they were having with balsam haze and chalk that up to unfortunate growing pains.
ecowarrior
Established
Growing pains? On their website it says "BUILT TO CREATE since 1756". How long do they want? 
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
On the other hand, my 35/2.5 pancake (one of the first batch of the Cosina Voigtlanders) is fine.
santino
FSU gear head
My Super wide Heliar too!
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
Cosina did not start with the Voigtlander line, introduced around the Millennium.
By then they were experienced making cameras and lenses for several decades.
In my experience lens shopping all older lenses may have some haze.
Specific models of various manufacturers may be more prone than others.
Sometimes haze can be removed easily by a technician; sometimes not.
Chris
By then they were experienced making cameras and lenses for several decades.
In my experience lens shopping all older lenses may have some haze.
Specific models of various manufacturers may be more prone than others.
Sometimes haze can be removed easily by a technician; sometimes not.
Chris
Last edited:
Erik van Straten
Veteran
My most used Voigtlander lens, the Color-Skopar 50mm f2.5 - after about 20 years of intensive use - does not have any haze or scratches on the glass.
Out to Lunch
Ventor
Even though 'anecdote' is not 'data', my Nokton 1.1/50, 1.2/35, Super-Wide Heliar 4.5/15, and Nokton 1.4/40 (or is a newer lens) do not have haze. And I live a good part of the year in Saigon where humidity levels are always high. In comparison, the sensor in my Leica M-E was fine while I lived in Central Europe but went on the blink after six months in Saigon.