FallisPhoto
Veteran
Boring lawsuit -- Violation of privacy or whining professional victims? What do you think?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10166532-93.html
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10166532-93.html
Gumby
Veteran
yes, it is a bore.
Gumby
Veteran
There are two separate issues, only one of which seems to be addressed:
1. Satellite imagery is not new and the precise intent is to collect images of "denied areas".
2. Just because satellite imagery can be collected, it may or may not be distributable.
1. Satellite imagery is not new and the precise intent is to collect images of "denied areas".
2. Just because satellite imagery can be collected, it may or may not be distributable.
FallisPhoto
Veteran
yes, it is a bore.
The family name is "Boring."
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
So boring.
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
So boring.
+1 and YES professional victims.
NOW, if someone sues because they're NOT on google maps THAT might be interesting, or at least less boring.
/
David Murphy
Veteran
Enjoy Google imagery while it last -- seems the politicians don't like it either:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/05/google_earth_blur_bill/
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/05/google_earth_blur_bill/
Share: