bence8810
Well-known
Hello all,
Have just acquired this 6x9 glass holder for my Lucky 90M-D enlarger so I can keep my negatives flat and despite the fact it has the Anti-Newton ring glass on the top - I spotted these rings yesterday on one of my prints. Inspecting the setup held up to a ceiling light I could clearly see the rings with the naked eye too.
Having then moved the negative around and wiped the glass one more time - the rings disappeared. What causes them and how to defeat this?
The carrier comes with glass on top and bottom. The bottom appears to be clear glass while the top is somewhat more matte - at least it looks that way to me.
Any reason why one should or should not use glass carriers other than the flatness?
I also quite like the fact I can print 135 negatives with a border now as I can leave a little slack on the negative as I frame with the easel.
Anyways - below are the two images. The first one is a zoomed in crop where you see the rings on the boys cheek and on the left in front of him.
The second picture is the one that shows the negative seated in the holder and held up to the light. The two images are exactly the same - the first one is just a crop so you can see the rings better.
Thanks,
Ben
Have just acquired this 6x9 glass holder for my Lucky 90M-D enlarger so I can keep my negatives flat and despite the fact it has the Anti-Newton ring glass on the top - I spotted these rings yesterday on one of my prints. Inspecting the setup held up to a ceiling light I could clearly see the rings with the naked eye too.
Having then moved the negative around and wiped the glass one more time - the rings disappeared. What causes them and how to defeat this?
The carrier comes with glass on top and bottom. The bottom appears to be clear glass while the top is somewhat more matte - at least it looks that way to me.
Any reason why one should or should not use glass carriers other than the flatness?
I also quite like the fact I can print 135 negatives with a border now as I can leave a little slack on the negative as I frame with the easel.
Anyways - below are the two images. The first one is a zoomed in crop where you see the rings on the boys cheek and on the left in front of him.
The second picture is the one that shows the negative seated in the holder and held up to the light. The two images are exactly the same - the first one is just a crop so you can see the rings better.
Thanks,
Ben