goffer
Well-known
Just pre-ordered the NEX-7 on amazon... the waiting game begins.
Does anyone know if the new 24 mp sensor in the Nex 7 has an AA filter or not? I was not that impressed with the image quality of the A77 sample images at DPR, but then again it might be just jpg compression or poor lens quality. I could not see any high frequency detail in the landscapes and images were very mushy looking.
Nice body. Shame about the size of the lenses.
Same question as I posted earlier: for using M-lenses what do you think would be better the NEX-7 or the Ricoh GXR M-Module, which is specially designed to use Leica M-lenses, with micro-lenses designed to optimize wide-angle, short distance to sensor M-lenses, and facility for adjusting corner rendition for specific lenses?
The attraction of the NEX-7 is 24MP vs the 12MP of the GXR M-Module and the built-in 2.4 million dot OLED EVP against a much lower quality clip-on EVP of the GXR M-Module. How does manual focusing compare?
—Mitch/Bangkok
Rainy Season
I also wish they were smaller, but I think it's important to put them into perspective. They're still relatively small compared to a lot of other systems. Essentially, the kit zoom, 30 Macro, 24 Zeiss and 50/1.8 are all about the same size, and it isn't THAT bad:
![]()
Still, I'll stick with rangefinder lenses.
The other advantage of NEX is being able to use the close focusing M adapter. For me this is huge...
The GXR will be limited to the standard close focus limit of the M lenses as far as I can determine.
I'm very attracted by the NEX-7 EVF, being built-in and high resolution, as I'm by the 24MP; but, as my main objective is to use my M-lenses as well the Voigtlaender 15 and Zeiss 18, the image quality based on the micro-lens design trumps everything. Although I was ready to get the GXR M-Module, considering I already have the GXR, I would still want to see whether the M-Module really does have an advantage in terms of image quality for M-lenses. Handling and user interface, at which the GXR excels, is also a factor, but the assignable 3-dials on the NEX-7 look good also.- The GXR module is developed for M glass so I'm assuming it might have a slight advantage, although Sony, this time around, has taken into account the use of adapted lens and thus has adapted the sensor for them.
-The EVF, at least on paper and initial reports, will be better than that of the GXR.
-I remember reading the GXR will have the same focus peaking feature so manual focus should be a similar experience.
I'm very attracted by the NEX-7 EVF, being built-in and high resolution, as I'm by the 24MP; but, as my main objective is to use my M-lenses as well the Voigtlaender 15 and Zeiss 18, the image quality based on the micro-lens design trumps everything. Although I was ready to get the GXR M-Module, considering I already have the GXR, I would still want to see whether the M-Module really does have an advantage in terms of image quality for M-lenses. Handling and user interface, at which the GXR excels, is also a factor, but the assignable 3-dials on the NEX-7 look good also.
—Mitch/Bangkok
Rainy Season
Minimum focus distanceWhat is "MFD".