LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
Dino, I think the older sister is more beautiful 
uh sorry my post is not about the lens at all
It looks like it is a great portrait lens! (now is ok)
uh sorry my post is not about the lens at all It looks like it is a great portrait lens! (now is ok)
Last edited:
rbsinto
Well-known
I have the AI mount version which I got about 30 years ago, as well as a recently acquired Nikon s-mount rangefinder version, and they are both wonderfully sharp lenses.
italy74
Well-known
Dino, I think the older sister is more beautiful
It looks like it is a great portrait lens! (now is ok)
Hahaha hard to say, usually Nicla (the younger) is trendier, more aggressive and better made up (eyes) but she's also a bit too slim imho, while Mara (the older) is sweeter, calmer and completely of a different kind. Each one has her own pros.
italy74
Well-known
About the 105 this is one of the latest taken a few days ago in southern Italy.
A couple asked me to take a few snapshots of their newborn
Wide open - Nikon D700 - 1600 iso - F/2.5 - 1/3000s
A couple asked me to take a few snapshots of their newborn
Wide open - Nikon D700 - 1600 iso - F/2.5 - 1/3000s
ampguy
Veteran
for F mount
for F mount
there are maybe a dozen variations, change from Sonnar was around 407K I think, and full M/C around 500K s/n. Blades #'s changed, as did hoods, lettering, screws, and min aperture.
I like the low 500K P*C versions with 5 screws, and multicoating, but have seen great images from all versions.
Here is a good s/n resource:
http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/serialno.html
as well as the articles on mir.com and the nikon tales archives
for F mount
there are maybe a dozen variations, change from Sonnar was around 407K I think, and full M/C around 500K s/n. Blades #'s changed, as did hoods, lettering, screws, and min aperture.
I like the low 500K P*C versions with 5 screws, and multicoating, but have seen great images from all versions.
Here is a good s/n resource:
http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/serialno.html
as well as the articles on mir.com and the nikon tales archives
capitalK
Warrior Poet :P
kxl
Social Documentary
I have the AI version. For the F-mount, the ones from April, 1971 and later (sn 407XXX and later) are the same general design - 5 elements in 4 groups.
The earliest version (1959 to March 1971, sn# 120XXX - 286XXX) was a Sonnar design and have 5 elements in 3 groups.
The LTM version is a Sonnar design.
ampguy
Veteran
wow
wow
amazing 3d-ishness in that first photo
wow
amazing 3d-ishness in that first photo
Bump for this great lens. So I ended up getting it after reading this thread (thanks all for the tips!) and after a few weeks finally took it out to play. I must say - this lens certanly has character. I like it very much. Best $100 spent in a long time!
Here are the first shots. Nothing serious, just playing around with friends' faces while drinking beer. I like how this lens gets right into peoples faces, tight, great FL for portraits. Shot on D700:
Yep, I'll be liking this lens long time
Ronny
Well-known
Great Lens for Nice Portraits!
Stuart John
Well-known
Spent some time today shoot my Nikkor 105 2.5. I have the older sonnar version. It's a great lens.
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
When I shot Nikon...
When I shot Nikon...
I owned a couple of 105/2.5 Nikkors, an old silver/black one, then a newer AI version.
I got some good negatives from both, but for portraits I preferred the much less highly regarded 85/2 AI Nikkor I later had.
The small difference in focal length could often made a big difference, like when chasing my (then) young daughter around...
Chris
When I shot Nikon...
I owned a couple of 105/2.5 Nikkors, an old silver/black one, then a newer AI version.
I got some good negatives from both, but for portraits I preferred the much less highly regarded 85/2 AI Nikkor I later had.
The small difference in focal length could often made a big difference, like when chasing my (then) young daughter around...
Chris
Last edited:
Harry Lime
Practitioner
It's a great lens. I have a Nikkor-P 2.5/105, which was converted to AI at some point.
The P is single coated and looks great in black and white. I also think that the non-sonnar versions have better bokeh.
From a shooting standpoint I have mixed feelings about the 105.
Yes, it is very sharp and all of that, but I find that anything longer than an 85mm tends to flatten things out a little too much for my taste. The 105 does have some of that telephoto look. The 85mm looks more neutral. Kind of like a 50 shot close up.
The P is single coated and looks great in black and white. I also think that the non-sonnar versions have better bokeh.
From a shooting standpoint I have mixed feelings about the 105.
Yes, it is very sharp and all of that, but I find that anything longer than an 85mm tends to flatten things out a little too much for my taste. The 105 does have some of that telephoto look. The 85mm looks more neutral. Kind of like a 50 shot close up.
raid
Dad Photographer
raid
Dad Photographer
raid
Dad Photographer
raid
Dad Photographer
raid
Dad Photographer
Brian Legge
Veteran
I picked one up as part of a trade on a SB28.
I still haven't used it since I've been shooting primarily with rangefinders recently. Maybe I'll take it out today.
Does anyone happen to know how it compares to the 85mm 1/8 AF? I love that lens and am curious if the 105 has anything going for it in comparison beyond being a different focal length.
I still haven't used it since I've been shooting primarily with rangefinders recently. Maybe I'll take it out today.
Does anyone happen to know how it compares to the 85mm 1/8 AF? I love that lens and am curious if the 105 has anything going for it in comparison beyond being a different focal length.
raid
Dad Photographer
Stuart John
Well-known
Yep it can flatten things out, I have not tried the 85mm f2. Must try one oneday.