I`m not that intrigued. I guess what I originally liked about mirrorless is that they used to be....or were closer to classic RF cameras than DSLRs (Leica X, Fuji X100, XE XPro). Now we are getting too many DSLR shaped mirrorless cameras that are just a little smaller and without a mirror. Thankfully, Fuji and Leica still make some small(ish) soap bar / rangefinder shaped bodies. If there is one thing that has stuck with me from my RF days is that I like small prime lenses and tend to stick with 28-85mm as my comfort zone. It seems that huge super wides and super long lenses will ensure that most of these new cameras will be dslr shaped with big grips and new school controls.
I`m not that intrigued. I guess what I originally liked about mirrorless is that they used to be....or were closer to classic RF cameras than DSLRs (Leica X, Fuji X100, XE XPro). Now we are getting too many DSLR shaped mirrorless cameras that are just a little smaller and without a mirror. Thankfully, Fuji and Leica still make some small(ish) soap bar / rangefinder shaped bodies. If there is one thing that has stuck with me from my RF days is that I like small prime lenses and tend to stick with 28-85mm as my comfort zone. It seems that huge super wides and super long lenses will ensure that most of these new cameras will be dslr shaped with big grips and new school controls.
I`m not that intrigued. I guess what I originally liked about mirrorless is that they used to be....or were closer to classic RF cameras than DSLRs (Leica X, Fuji X100, XE XPro). Now we are getting too many DSLR shaped mirrorless cameras that are just a little smaller and without a mirror. Thankfully, Fuji and Leica still make some small(ish) soap bar / rangefinder shaped bodies. If there is one thing that has stuck with me from my RF days is that I like small prime lenses and tend to stick with 28-85mm as my comfort zone. It seems that huge super wides and super long lenses will ensure that most of these new cameras will be dslr shaped with big grips and new school controls.
Nikon teaser video (link). Very large new mount called Z mount incompatible with prior Nikkor glass without proprietary Nikon adapter. Likely very fast glass to follow.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZldXR313k4M
I thought I was the only one. I really dislike the slr look of some mirrorless
I`m not that intrigued. I guess what I originally liked about mirrorless is that they used to be....or were closer to classic RF cameras than DSLRs (Leica X, Fuji X100, XE XPro). Now we are getting too many DSLR shaped mirrorless cameras that are just a little smaller and without a mirror. Thankfully, Fuji and Leica still make some small(ish) soap bar / rangefinder shaped bodies. If there is one thing that has stuck with me from my RF days is that I like small prime lenses and tend to stick with 28-85mm as my comfort zone. It seems that huge super wides and super long lenses will ensure that most of these new cameras will be dslr shaped with big grips and new school controls.
Olympus makes a tiny RF shaped mirrorless body, the digital Pen-F. They also make some tiny prime lenses for it, as does Panasonic. The Pen-F is a Micro Four Thirds camera.
I have been shooting with a Pen-F for several months now and I love it. The PanaLeica 15mm f1.7 (30mm), the Olympus 25mm f1.8 (50mm), and the Olympus 45mm f1.8 (90mm) are incredibly sharp and inexpensive lenses.
Same for me. But if you're trying to make money, which model would you follow - X-Pro or A7 series? Sony recently surpassed Nikon in FF ILC maket share. The DSLR design isn't for me either, but I know we here at RFF are a tiny minority.
Too little..too late..