Nikon D750

[hap]

Hi Hap,

Congrats on the D750. I've heard only good things about that camera. You might want to check out Thom Hogan's website https://bythom.com. He's a well respected Nikon expert, tons of information available. From what I remember reading regarding a suitable lens for your camera, the 24-85 as some here have suggested what be a nice fit for your D750. Good luck and enjoy

best,
Paul

Of course Thom Hogan guides are behind a paywall. It's worth it. On his website it says

"What's covered? Autofocus, metering, video, card selection and use, lenses, image quality, and yes, even the D750 shutter shading problem...basically everything there is to know about the D750. "

The person who sold his camera to me said it was recalled. he did not explain why it was recalled. But...Nikon replaced the shutter in June of this year and the entire camera is under 6 monts warranty.

But here is the weirdest part. the camera was refurbished by Nikon and it had 220K shutter actuations. I have the paperwork from Nikon that they replaced the shutter...but they did not reset the shutter count. I called them and damned if Nikon has a policy not to reset the shutter count even if replaced. I got that in writing.

 

[shawn]

I may be wrong but I think all D-series lenses have the ability to use all the functions of the G-series, like 3D metering and flash functions. The differences are only the G lenses have built-in motors and the D lenses use the screw driver shaft to run the lens on AF. The pre-D AF lenses didn't include the chip to read distance so they can't do flash functions like the G lenses.

If you just want a new tech general purpose lens, the 24-120/4VR is a good choice. It's a fairly heavy lens, however. For a lighter weight one, I personally like the 24-85/3.5-4.5VR.

The ‘D’ lenses added distance info to the chip ( there are non-D chipped lenses) for the 3d flash exposure. Like you said no chipped lens needs aperture of focal length to be manually entered in the camera. They are all screw drive lenses. AF-S lenses added the af motor and then later versions of those became the ‘G’ lenses without aperture rings.

Totally agree about the 24-85. I had the original non-vr version and it was a great lens.

Shawn

 

[PaulW128]

Of course Thom Hogan guides are behind a paywall. It's worth it. On his website it says

"What's covered? Autofocus, metering, video, card selection and use, lenses, image quality, and yes, even the D750 shutter shading problem...basically everything there is to know about the D750. "

The person who sold his camera to me said it was recalled. he did not explain why it was recalled. But...Nikon replaced the shutter in June of this year and the entire camera is under 6 monts warranty.

But here is the weirdest part. the camera was refurbished by Nikon and it had 220K shutter actuations. I have the paperwork from Nikon that they replaced the shutter...but they did not reset the shutter count. I called them and damned if Nikon has a policy not to reset the shutter count even if replaced. I got that in writing.

Hap,

Thom's camera guide books are great but I was talking about his reviews of all things Nikon, especially the 24-85 you're considering.But, by all means, get the D750 guidebook. I've bought Thom's guide for several Nikons and they are well worth the money.

 

[hap]

I very much appreciate the enthusiasm and the wisdom of everyone who responded. Extremely helpful.

This is a wonderful community.

Hap

 

[AlwaysOnAuto]

I really wanted a D750 when it came out. Mostly for the low light shooting it's capable of doing.
Now I look at them and F2's and Nikkormat's and cringe at the weight.
More power to you if you're able to heft them now.

 

[css9450]

Certain D750s were recalled and some had issues which were fixed under warranty. Mine is of the latter example: it had a shutter issue where it looked like one of the horizontal shutter blades would get stuck and not clear itself out of the way during the exposure. I sent it to Nikon in Melville NY and they got it back to me about ten days later, at no charge. It's been fine ever since.

As was mentioned above, all AF lenses ("D" and non-"D") will work perfectly. You won't miss much capability by using a non-"D" lens, just some exposure calculations while using flash. But the non-"D" lenses are now pushing thirty years old by now so it's probably a non-issue. The "D" versions are much more plentiful I think (they're still available brand new).

My very best and sharpest Nikon lens is my 80-200/f2.8"D" zoom.... It's a big and heavy beast of a lens and it works outstanding on the D750. I thought long and hard and paid the big money for it back in 1995 and have never regretted it for a moment. It still is a fantastic lens. But probably heavier than you're looking for.

 

[hap]

If you can hold out, I think that the 24-200 that is for the Z series will eventually be made for the F series. It's a great lens for that all around carry.

Maybe a stupid question...but why would Nikon want to make an F mount version of a popular lens in Z mount?

 

[hap]

Certain D750s were recalled and some had issues which were fixed under warranty. Mine is of the latter example: it had a shutter issue where it looked like one of the horizontal shutter blades would get stuck and not clear itself out of the way during the exposure. I sent it to Nikon in Melville NY and they got it back to me about ten days later, at no charge. It's been fine ever since.

As was mentioned above, all AF lenses ("D" and non-"D") will work perfectly. You won't miss much capability by using a non-"D" lens, just some exposure calculations while using flash. But the non-"D" lenses are now pushing thirty years old by now so it's probably a non-issue. The "D" versions are much more plentiful I think (they're still available brand new).

My very best and sharpest Nikon lens is my 80-200/f2.8"D" zoom.... It's a big and heavy beast of a lens and it works outstanding on the D750. I thought long and hard and paid the big money for it back in 1995 and have never regretted it for a moment. It still is a fantastic lens. But probably heavier than you're looking for.

I also have a 80-200 D 2.8 zoom. Have had it for ages. Almost never use it because beastly and I am older. I should probably take it our someday soon and give it some "exercise". I will try in on the 750 since I will get "instant" feedback . Is there a collar available for the 80-200?

 

[css9450]

Is there a collar available for the 80-200?

Yes, sort of.... I have one made by Kirk in 1995 or 1996 and it adds even more size and bulk to the lens. A few years later, they changed it to make it smaller, but it became less versatile. I don't think the new version allows vertical shooting. I also doubt it is still in production, since Kirk is a smaller company and they eventually retire older items when they become slow sellers.

 

[Ronald M]

The older Nikon glass (non-CPU = Central Processing Unit, a program within the D750 and other modern D cameras) do not have all the contacts for the full range of D750 camera function. The D lenses will autofocus, but to get optimal color metering and flash function, you can enter the lens focal length and max. aperture into the camera's custom settings (see page 235 of the D750 manual, or just go to Menu --->custom settings ---> non-CPU lenses)
You can enter up to 9 non-CPU lenses into the camera.

As a new D750 owner, I chose the 24-120 F4 (not the 3.5-5.6) lens as my first modern CPU lens. The 50 mm 1.8 lens is another good choice (inexpensive, too) as well as several 35mm options. I have the Nikon AF 35mm f2 D lens, and the 60mm F2.8 D micro-nikkor macro lense. Autofocus and metering are fine, and I see no need to upgrade to the G or S lenses at this time. Maybe later😉

All great choices. 24/120 4.0 is a pretty decent zoom. I am a macro lens freak so 60 and 100 2.8 do well close AND far.

 

[shawn]

My very best and sharpest Nikon lens is my 80-200/f2.8"D" zoom.... It's a big and heavy beast of a lens and it works outstanding on the D750. I thought long and hard and paid the big money for it back in 1995 and have never regretted it for a moment. It still is a fantastic lens. But probably heavier than you're looking for.

That was my first Nikon black crinkle coat lens. I had the push/pull version. Totally agree about the optics and weight of it. Wonderful glass. Just be careful of the A/M switch. Apparently if they go they can't be fixed anymore.

Of that generation the 135mm f2 DC is even sharper but my favorite of all is the 85mm f1.4D 'Cream Machine'.

That lens is special.

Shawn

 

[shawn]

Yes, sort of.... I have one made by Kirk in 1995 or 1996 and it adds even more size and bulk to the lens. A few years later, they changed it to make it smaller, but it became less versatile. I don't think the new version allows vertical shooting. I also doubt it is still in production, since Kirk is a smaller company and they eventually retire older items when they become slow sellers.

The two ring version after the push-pull has a tripod ring built in. The ring rotated for portrait shooting. The lens also had an internal focus version with a ring but I don't know if it rotated or not. Then the 70-200 AFS VR replaced it.

Shawn

 

[hap]

I pulled my push pull version out of the closet. It's more of a beast than I thought and not easy to handle. I'd have to shoot this thing on a bean bag. Would not want to mount the camera to a tripod.

the A-M switch is stuck on A. Will not move but plastic not split or broken. It autofocuses like a champ still, even on a N80. any suggests for moving the AM switch ring? Or just live with it.

 

[hap]

That was my first Nikon black crinkle coat lens. I had the push/pull version. Totally agree about the optics and weight of it. Wonderful glass. Just be careful of the A/M switch. Apparently if they go they can't be fixed anymore.

Of that generation the 135mm f2 DC is even sharper but my favorite of all is the 85mm f1.4D 'Cream Machine'.

That lens is special.

Shawn

I have the less expensive and slower 1.8 85 AFD. Pretty good lens.

 

[hap]

the Nikon response regarding the policy not to reset a shutter count after replacement.

Dear Me,

"Thank you for contacting Nikon. The service center does not reset shutter counts on cameras bodies that have had a shutter replacement. This is a decision that Nikon has made in regards to repairs and how they perform them. If you have any further questions or concerns please contact Nikon back.

Best Regards,

Kim K "

Translation....we do what we want. If you don't like, buy a Canon.

 

[css9450]

That was my first Nikon black crinkle coat lens. I had the push/pull version. Totally agree about the optics and weight of it. Wonderful glass. Just be careful of the A/M switch. Apparently if they go they can't be fixed anymore.

An interesting nice but unintended feature of the Kirk tripod collar for this lens, is that the lens collar has a ring with a little scallop cut out of the bottom that protects the A/M switch. It takes very small fingers to depress that button while simultaneously rotating the inner and outer mounting rings! Much more trouble than it sounds like. I almost never change mine.

 

[hap]

An interesting nice but unintended feature of the Kirk tripod collar for this lens, is that the lens collar has a ring with a little scallop cut out of the bottom that protects the A/M switch. It takes very small fingers to depress that button while simultaneously rotating the inner and outer mounting rings! Much more trouble than it sounds like. I almost never change mine.

Mine just seems stuck on A. Unlikely I'd buy a Kirk collar . However, if you have a picture of the collar, I'd certain like to see it.

 

[css9450]

I'll take a photo and post it....

 

[hap]

I'll take a photo and post it....

super...thanks!

 

[hap]

I haven't looked hard for the original kirk collar compatible with the push pull model. However, there is an adjustable model from Manfrotto that seems to work, according to some of the questions and reviews. 99$

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/554350-REG/Manfrotto_293_293_Telephoto_Lens_Support.html