Calzone
Gear Whore #1
Cal, just for giggles, how do you compare the 45 pancake to the 50 1.8 E in terms of IQ?
While selling off a retired photographer's gear, I got unwillingly infected by the F bug during tests of lenses on his FM2, FE2, F3, F2as. Almost kept one but told myself that OM system is plenty, but persisted in selling them--yet now have an FE and F2 on the way, and am looking at one or the other of the pancake lenses.
Robert,
I can only offer my opinion on the 45/2.8P AIS as I have no experiance with the 50/1.8 "E" lens.
If you are looking for a compac F-mount lens the profile of the 45/2.8 AIS is less than 3/4's if an inch. One reviewer bashed the lens over ergonomics because the focus and F-stops are so close together. If you do not have sausage fingers this really is of no concern.
If you like the signature of a Tessar lens then you will like this lens. Wide open it is sharp, but perhaps not the best in the corners. At F5.6 it seems to be best.
One thing to know is that this is a very simple lens with only 5 elements. Combine the few elements with the modern Nikon Intergrated Coating (NIC) and you get Nikon's most contrasty lens. I generally tend to shoot with a 2x yellow filter, but not on this lens.
Understand that the 45/2.8 has a very quick focus rotation kinda like a 55/2.8 Macro AIS. A slight turn is all that is needed to go from infinity to 7 feet. This makes for a good lens for street. The 45/2.8 is also a chipped lens if used on a more advanced body than say my F3P.
I own no hood and the 45/2.8 is very flare resistant.
Now for the GAS: a 45/2.8P AIS on a F2 with DE-1 eye-level prism is shorter than a M-body if you discount the bump for the prism, and only a little longer. I've built and owned three of these (one chrome and 2 black versions).
Cal