Nikon FA or FE2??

I've owned and used both the FE-2 and the FA, and in fact traded the former to get the latter.
In my opinion, the FA is all the camera the FE-2 is and more because of its AMP (Matrix) metering system, in additon to the usual Nikon center-weighted metering that the FE-2 has.
And for those who need them the FA has the additional Shutter Priority and Program exposure modes.
The only features that I preferred on the FE-2 body was the extended shutter speed range (up to eight seconds compared to the FA's one second), and the FE-2's Depth of Field Preview Lever which is more robust that the one on the FA, and works in the same manner as the those on the other Nikon bodies, while the FA's works in the opposite fashion.
 
I have and use both FA and FE2. No problems with either after close to 25 years. Something to be aware of is that the exposure meters don't agree, with the FE2 generally registering more exposure than the FA. But somehow Velvia still comes out well exposed with either camera. If I ever figure out why that is, I'll let you know . . .
 
I have and use both FA and FE2. No problems with either after close to 25 years. Something to be aware of is that the exposure meters don't agree, with the FE2 generally registering more exposure than the FA. But somehow Velvia still comes out well exposed with either camera. If I ever figure out why that is, I'll let you know . . .



Velvia 50 in my first Nikon FE came out soooo nice it sold me on Nikon's metering...
 
I had all three at varying points, and for some odd reason the lowly FG might have been my favorite. Although from a technical standpoint the FA does it all, the FG is so small and light and cute (!) that I just loved shooting with it. Hell, maybe it was just for pure sentimental reasons since the FG was the camera I took on an awesome trip to Costa Rica.
 
The Nikon Center Weighed Meter has always been a bit heavy in the center... a revolution in metering when it introduced in the Nikon F of 1964

A lot to mull over, The F3 is a bit out of price for what I want to spend (under $160 If I can)... I must agree, though, it is a solid camera with a smaller prism than past F's
 
The FA's matrix metering would seal the deal for me.

As for the build quality of the little FG, I used a pair of lowly EMs for years and was astounded by how durable they were. The EM and the FG are on the same chassis. So I wouldn't write off the FG, especially if you're pre-setting focus and exposure for your street photography.
 
The FA's matrix metering would seal the deal for me.

As for the build quality of the little FG, I used a pair of lowly EMs for years and was astounded by how durable they were. The EM and the FG are on the same chassis. So I wouldn't write off the FG, especially if you're pre-setting focus and exposure for your street photography.

I always thought the FG was an excellent camera, but it lacks a Depth-of-Field Preview mechanism, which I feel is an essential feature for any SLR to have.
 
I want the higher speeds, at least 1/2000, I shoot 400 film at f/11 or f/16 or so, and on a bright day, it will require above 1/1000

The F3 may be an option, it will take longer to find one on my budget... but, this is all for Feb/March... just before Spring. I plan on selling some Stirling Silver flat ware.. from an inheritance, I have about 8lbs worth, if it is all SS... about $2500. (12oz per English Pound) at $28.00/oz as of today... I hope... but most will goes towards a CC pay down.
 
I have had an FE2 for about 25 years. I have always thought it's a great light weight SLR. I have a Nikon F and have had a F100 which I also loved but, I will always keep the FE2. Get a FE2. Jim
 
I've owned or used all the machines suggested in this thread. I think the FE2 is a better machine than the FA. The meter readout on the FE is almost usable (no LCD to get nasty over time, but impossible to use in the dark) and the top plate on the FA is plastic (as opposed to metal on the FE2). Other than these and matrix metering, however, they are very much the same. The FA also takes the same motor drive, but it also takes the rather nice MD-15, which uses the AA's instead of the battery in the camera. I'd go with the FE2 if these were the only choices. The viewfinders are marginal at best if you have glasses, though.

The F3 is quite a bit bigger, has a slower shutter and sync speed, and has the same kind of readout as the FA (I.e.: not that hot, but it at least has a light, albeit with a very crappy button and a flaky circuit). The wind stroke may be smooth, but it is also obscenely long (i.e.: like 180 degrees to the 135 degrees of the FM/FE or F2... shoot them side-by-side and you'll notice the difference, and it's a pain IMHO). These cameras really shine, however, with the MD-4. KEH has F3HPs (fantastic for glasses, and the best of all MF Nikons) for $99 for Bargain grade (bit scuffed, but fully working, less if there's an engraving) with a 6-month warranty. Hard to go wrong there, actually. Oh, as noted, they made a million of them. MD-4's are in the $10-20 range. A bit heavy, but absolutely rock-solid inside and out. There's a reason they outlasted the F4 and almost through the F5.

The FM2n has the best display (an LED won't die like an LCD, and you can actually see it in the dark). Sure, it has no auto, but you technically don't need batteries for it EVER. Just get used to seeing your light and you won't even need to meter. Use Sunny 16, subtract 2 or 3 for open shadows or a cloudy day and learn what the lighting is in your favorite bar (1/60 @ f/2 w/ ISO 3200 for mine, plus 2 stops for behind the bar, minus 1EV at the dark end and 1/125 @f/2.8 in the booths, for example).

As far as ISO 400 film at f/16 or f/11, unless you're shooting on a beach or sunny field of snow, you will never need more than 1/1000th of a second. An FE would be fine (I like mine quite a bit) and also takes older non-AI lenses without modifications to either camera or lens. Not as many repair parts as there used to be, but they're still fixable (ask Hexar RF owners about that on a camera 20 years newer by a smaller manufacturer). The FM has the same advantages as the FM2n, just a slower shutter.

The FM3a will cost you 4x as much as an FE2 or FM2n. While it's nice, it doesn't add anything but all-mechanical speeds to an FE2 (which isn't exactly a battery hog, BTW). It's well outside your $160 budget, so don't worry about it.

The FG, while it doesn't have a DoF preview button, is a swell little machine. Very, very tiny and pretty quiet, too. The meter display has LEDs, so you can see it in the dark. Pair it with a Series E 50mm and you have a cheap, quality machine which you won't mind if it gets a little dirty or dinged.

I liked the F and F2, myself, but the cameras are a bit bigger and the metered heads are huge (and often not working). Plain prisms (especially for the F2) are obscenely expensive (as in $400 or more if it's a nice one or black), but are the best users now.

DO NOT think of buying a camera to "fix it up" as a way to save money unless a) you're experienced in repairs, and b) you have another camera to shoot. Junk cameras are often just that -- junk. Never expect an eBay seller to be fully honest about all the problems. If they say there's one problem that renders it inoperative, assume it's scrap from a number of problems and pay accordingly.

Well, hope that was helpful.

--Bob
 
I was looking at an FA, but it felt a bit plasticky and more electronic and less mechanical. Got an FE2 instead which is a fantastic and solid camera. I once dropped my FE2 on the street while biking, and it still works perfectly. I still have it, although I do not use it anymore since I made the switch to rangefinder.
 
Back
Top Bottom