Nikon SP: is it worth it in addition to S2 / S3 ?

The separate finder for the 35/28 on the SP is slightly off-set from the main finder. You simply focus with the patch in the regular finder - slide your eye a fraction to the left and there are the 35/28 finders. The 35 has frame-lines (no parallax correction though) and the 28 is the full view - out to the edge of the finder. Sounds more complicated than it is - becomes intuitive very quickly.
 
Nikon sp

Nikon sp

The wide angle finder is a simple optical finder , the entire view is the 28 , there are black lines for the 35 , with dotted lines for close up with 35 .
Similar to the frame marks in a separate leitz finder without the brightline effect .

The two viewfinder windows remind me of a Leica iiic , focus through one frame with the other , although the Nikon finder is far advanced from the iiic .
The main finder has a 1:1 ratio with a central rf spot , move your eye slightly to the left , the optical 28/35 finder is in view . Easier in practice than it sounds .

The sp has frame lines for 6 lenses , if you cut your teeth on Nikon you will like it .
The Leica m2 combined finder is in some ways better , the combined rf/view is nice , the rf spot in a m2 is smaller , but some prefer not moving your eye to frame ,
Haveing used both , for me the 35 mm focal length works better with an m2 .the 28 mm focal length is better on a Nikon sp .
I do think I get more accurate focus with either lens on the Nikon .

I had a Leica m5 with a 35 summilux for many years , and my Nikon s2 sat on a shelf .
The wide aperature 35 with through the lens meter was the draw .
At one point I tested the summilux against the 35 1.8 nikkor on the s2 .
I could not see any difference in results . The summilux lost more contrast wide open is all that I noticed .

The Nikon sp is truly a great professional camera , 65 years later it is difficult to find a great one . Some times the beatest looking ones have the best finders .
You really have to look for one with a bright rf spot .
Often the wide angle finder has black spots - most service people do not want to touch the wide angle finder due to its many optical parts and surfaces .
Budget for a complete servicing if it does not go your way .
 
IMO it depends entirely on lens preference. If you use only the 50, or are happy with an external finder, then no need for SP.

I had my S3 RF patch cleaned and it's much brighter than my S2.
 
Nikon sp

Nikon sp

The s2 and s3 have reflected bright line finders , if you wear glasses
The flare problem is worse as your eye is farther from the finder and stray
Light enters and is reflected , the s3 is not as good as the s2 in comparison .
The sp has projected bright lines like a Leica m so flare is not a problem
(Wide angle finder has etched lines )

The sp 2005 is a newer camera , it is also black and comes with the newer multicoated 35 /1.8 black rim nikkor . The finder will be cleaner and brighter than a vintage sp . I had one and sold it . Was too afraid of getting a bump or scratch on it , so always used the s2 instead .
 
I haven't used my S3 2000 since I bought it. I got it for the 50/1.4 lens. As for your question, I would get the SP if your mind is set on it.
 
So this is my lesson learned from your inputs:

1) Get an SP 😀
2) Get one if I can assess the RF patch for good
3) Don't be lured by the external aspect in either way

Thank you, thank you !
 
Raid, hasn't been about a year since you bought your S3 2000 + Millennium Nikkor?

Maybe a little less than that. I have been using mainly the M8/M9 combo, but I bought two scanners (one i broken), which may imply a return to film. I may get tired from using digital cameras one day.
 
Back
Top Bottom