Thardy
Veteran
Anything "collectible" has a premium![]()
Maybe a new m mount version is on then way?
ampguy
Veteran
Hi Thomas
Hi Thomas
I've owned both and now just own the v2. It is built better, longer focus throw for focusing accuracy, and less/no purple fringing.
Also, when used properly, virtually no distortion.
Hi Thomas
I've owned both and now just own the v2. It is built better, longer focus throw for focusing accuracy, and less/no purple fringing.
Also, when used properly, virtually no distortion.
The only thing I didn't like about the v1 f1,2 nokton was the extent to which it intruded into the VF. The distortion, the weight, the build quality, etc. -- all these were not an issue for me in use.
Ted -- I think v2 and v3 lux 50s are very similar in rendering. That said, I have used both and have grown to prefer the 'sweetness' of the OOF rendering of the v2 -- the coatings in the v3 do make a bit of difference which is just subtly different. The ,7m or 1m is the big difference in use. The subtle rendering difference is what makes the v2 a small gem of a lens, albeit with 1m closest focus limitation.