Thardy
Veteran
Oh well, they'll get used to it. The majority of people here were against a lot of things a few short years ago.
Protests seem to make good photos though.
Protests seem to make good photos though.
mugent
Well-known
Oh well, they'll get used to it. The majority of people here were against a lot of things a few short years ago.
Protests seem to make good photos though.
People may have to put up with things they don't like, but Australia is supposed to be democratic, in this case, it clearly isn't.
john_s
Well-known
Surely there comes a point where the negative PR for McDonalds overcomes the need to get their own way. To keep pushing this seems foolish to me!
As for the police ...![]()
I suppose there comes a point where they give up, but it's a lot further down the track than you'd think. Remember the McLibel case in the uk:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLibel_case
And on the subject of the police, they infiltrated the little band of greens to "help" create the aforementioned piece of libel:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jun/21/mclibel-leaflet-police-bob-lambert-mcdonalds
Thardy
Veteran
People may have to put up with things they don't like, but Australia is supposed to be democratic, in this case, it clearly isn't.
Yeah, same as in US.
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
The thing that gets me about companies like McDonalds is that there's a public perception of them doing good in the community via various charities and organisations. The only people McDonalds help are themselves ... that wonderfully benign clown that represents them is probably responsible for generations of children becoming hooked on fast food and its associated health issues.
No better than the morally bereft tobacco companies IMO ... they (Maccas) probably ruin the lives of as many people (health wise) but get a free run with virtually no regulation applied to what they are doing. Any ten year old can walk in and order 2300 kilojoules of Big Mac poison any time they want ... a couple of those a day may even finish them off quicker than a smoking habit!
No better than the morally bereft tobacco companies IMO ... they (Maccas) probably ruin the lives of as many people (health wise) but get a free run with virtually no regulation applied to what they are doing. Any ten year old can walk in and order 2300 kilojoules of Big Mac poison any time they want ... a couple of those a day may even finish them off quicker than a smoking habit!
mugent
Well-known
The thing that gets me about companies like McDonalds is that there's a public perception of them doing good in the community via various charities and organisations. The only people McDonalds help are themselves ... that wonderfully benign clown that represents them is probably responsible for generations of children becoming hooked on fast food and its associated health issues.
No better than the morally bereft tobacco companies IMO ... they (Maccas) probably ruin the lives of as many people (health wise) but get a free run with virtually no regulation applied to what they are doing. Any ten year old can walk in and order 2300 kilojoules of Big Mac poison any time they want ... a couple of those a day may even finish them off quicker than a smoking habit!
Society doesn't really recognize the danger of poor diet, especially in the young, where growth can really be affected by poor nutrition. I believe a grown adult should be able to eat whatever crap they want, but I've seen mothers give a toddler a bag of crisps (chips for US readers) and a can of Coke for breakfast, that makes my skin crawl a bit.
After another day of protesting, I should say that the behaviour of the local police has been great, friendly and understanding of our cause. The Victoria State Police were less pleasant.
mugent
Well-known
I suppose there comes a point where they give up, but it's a lot further down the track than you'd think. Remember the McLibel case in the uk:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLibel_case
And on the subject of the police, they infiltrated the little band of greens to "help" create the aforementioned piece of libel:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jun/21/mclibel-leaflet-police-bob-lambert-mcdonalds
There are undercover police officers at the protest in Tecoma, they stand out like a sore thumb, it's quite laughable.
mugent
Well-known
More from Tecoma...
8 of our community members are being sued by McDonalds now, for protesting...
8 of our community members are being sued by McDonalds now, for protesting...

Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
More from Tecoma...
8 of our community members are being sued by McDonalds now, for protesting...
![]()
WHAT? :bang:
F*** them ... it'll be a dark day before I ever set foot in a McDonalds again!
mugent
Well-known
WHAT? :bang:
F*** them ... it'll be a dark day before I ever set foot in a McDonalds again!
Indeed, **** them, you can read more about it here...
http://tecoma8.org/
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
I'd like to see about twenty thousand protestors converge on the place ... and see how they deal with that!
mugent
Well-known
I'd like to see about twenty thousand protestors converge on the place ... and see how they deal with that!
I'd like to see that too, there is a march happening this weekend, hopefully it'll match the previous one of 3k people turning up,but I think the civil case might scaring people off...
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
(My emphasis.)The interim injunction in place until the 1st August, not only places restrictions on the 8 people served but anybody who entered the McDonald’s site, without their consent, between 1 and 17 July 2013 and anybody who impeded the access of workers or vehicles to the McDonald’s site between 1 and 17 July 2013.
The injunction not only prevents all those covered from protesting non-violently within a specified area but also prevents them encouraging others to continue to non-violently resist the demolition at the site. The judge said that social media was not to be used by those covered by the injunction as “a call to arms”. The McDonald’s lawyers brought into court as evidence reams of screenshots from social media. This is arguably the most undemocratic and controversial part of the interim order.
Arguably! Too bleedin' right you could argue that. Where are all our fine establishment "defenders of free speech" for this one? Andrew Bolt, perhaps. Of course he would stand up to the big end of town in support of such a dearly held principle!
I thought not...
...Mike
mugent
Well-known
An unpleasant day at the protest today, a police officer took it upon him to attack a protester, unprovoked. Since when is using stilts a criminal offence?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMUEmKEbfaE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMUEmKEbfaE
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
An unpleasant day at the protest today, a police officer took it upon him to attack a protester, unprovoked. Since when is using stilts a criminal offence?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMUEmKEbfaE
Bloody hell!
Several things strike me about the current situation ... the government via it's personal militia is happy to protect big business, which is no surprise.
And I wouldn't be a cop for all the Noctiluxes in the world ... they generally just looked bewildered and wishing like hell they were doing something else!
Thanks a lot for the update and your personal take on this.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.