Vickko
Veteran
Here are a couple photos, showing the difference between my Noctilux 50mm f1.2 and Zunow 5cm f1.1 with lens defect.
First photo is from the Zunow, wide open. Second photo it the Noctilux, wide open.
...Vick
First photo is from the Zunow, wide open. Second photo it the Noctilux, wide open.
...Vick
Attachments
Vickko
Veteran
David Murphy
Veteran
The Noctilux edges the Zunow it seems, but the Zunow is a little faster. I get the impression that the Noctilux 50/1.2 is also rare, but probably more common than a Zunow. There's a Noctilux 50/1.2 listed on eBay now for $9,999.00 which I think is more than Zunow's usually sell for although there's not a lot of data on this!
David Murphy
Veteran
I just noticed there are two 50mm F1.1 Zunow's for sale on eBay right now -- around 5K each, one for Contax the other for LTM. The Contax one looks particularly interesting - insanely fast for a Contax lens. If I had a spare 5K I'd buy it (not likely any time soon!) .
... It's so hard not to fall under the spell of glass this exotic
... It's so hard not to fall under the spell of glass this exotic
f16sunshine
Moderator
Hard to tell from such small files.
aoresteen
Well-known
I'll just use my Canon 50mm f/1.2. Much cheaper! 
aoresteen
Well-known
Well, what about the new Voigtlander Nocton 50mm f/1.1? At $1,000 new wouldn't that make more sense than $5,000 for the Zunow?
Nokton48
Veteran
I prefer my old fast Canons; the 35mm F1.5, the 50mm F1.2, and the 85mm F1.5 .
David Murphy
Veteran
Yes it makes perfect sense, but good sense and the rangefinder hobby are usually diametrically opposed concepts.
Well, what about the new Voigtlander Nocton 50mm f/1.1? At $1,000 new wouldn't that make more sense than $5,000 for the Zunow?
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.