Noctilux and 75 lux

mars said:
did you guys know why Leica decided to discontinue this lens?
I was planning to get one earlier. Is it still a good idea to get one then? Is the used price going to go up or go down, I wondered?
No, but there was one for sale a couple of days ago in the photo.net classifieds for $1650 - don't know if it's still there. I would say the price will go up...
 
peter_n said:
No, but there was one for sale a couple of days ago in the photo.net classifieds for $1650 - don't know if it's still there. I would say the price will go up...

thanks Peter for all the info... will let you know if I managed to find one... =)
 
The price of the Summilux 75 will go up fast.
Even more, second hand lenses have dissapeared !!!!
 
I shoot pretty much only available light, wide open. I love my 75mm Summilux. I picked one up on eBay for under $1,500 last year, ended up with a SECOND one in trade (long story, involving a bad GAS decision) which I sold ofr almost $2,300 early this year. Wish I had waited until Leica's discontinuation announcement!

Let the flames start - I picked up a Canon 50mm/f0.95 for the really low-light stuff. I just could not stomach the used-market prices for the Noctilux. More rationalization - a pro photographer friend of mine suggested exposure with the Noctilux fell as much as two stops in the corners - talk about a lens signature! Yes, the Canon has its own signature. It is not sharp or contrasty. Still love it, and I was only out about $700.

- John
 
your Canon vignettes wide open too...it's just what f/1 lenses do...
 
is there a center filter made in E60 size? I am having some fun with the center filter (made for 15/2.8 ZM distagon) on EF 35/1.4L and EF 50/1.2L.


the 75/1.4 Lux has less vignetting than the 50/1 Noct.
 
summilux said:
is there a center filter made in E60 size? I am having some fun with the center filter (made for 15/2.8 ZM distagon) on EF 35/1.4L and EF 50/1.2L.


the 75/1.4 Lux has less vignetting than the 50/1 Noct.

which center filter are you using on the Canon? thank you.
 
I have the 75/1,4 and the 75/2 and over the years I have owned and used 1/2 dozen Noctiluxes. The F1 is an interesting lens, but as a "standard" lens it is not to my taste. To much fall off at f1 and for the rest of the scale (1.4 onward) it is a good lens, but certainly not a great one. A much better choice is the 50/1,4 Summilux ASPH. This lens probably represents the apex of 50mm lens design! It is as sharp as you could ever want and with a brilliant close-focus performance. The Noctilux is at best mediocre at 1m! My last Noctilux I dumped a couple of years ago and since I got the 50/1,4 ASPH I have never looked back.
The 75/1,4 and the 75/2 are two different lenses in how they render our three dimensions into two. I have owned 75/1,4's since they were made. The firdst one was a pre-procuction sample that I got from Leica Midland in 1981. I did upgrade it in the mid 90's and that is the lens I have now. It is a "special" lens - you dont take it out for a daytime stroll. It is the one that comes out when the light dims and you need the look. Very smooth tonality in bl/w but you better get the focus right. Sharp drop off from in focus to out of focus. You often have to dedicated a body to it as it has a tendency to shift focus depending on the camera! On my 0,85 it works well, except at closest distance where it is off by about 15 mm. On a "modified" M4P (focus arm is bent slightly to accomodate it) it works across the board. These days i use it with a Bessa R3M as this camera has a freestanding 75 frame that works better than the "mixed" 50/75 on the M's. the short base of the Bessa R3 requires that you REALLY focus carefully and though slow it works for me.
The 75/2 ASPH is just a damned good lens! It is very sharp, great close-focus and actually quite portable! Neither the Nocti and the 75/1,4 can be considered comfortable "walk about" lenses!
We just came back from 2 weeks in Japan. My kit was a 21/4 VC, a 40/1,4 VC multicoated and the 75/2. Three bodies, a M2, a R3M and the new R4M (21/25/28/35/50 finders in the viewfinder). The kit was small enough that i could carry it without listing to the left and i did not miss any other lens (well, a 35/2 could have come along to be truthful). Close to 50 rolls of bl/w film and not a single shot that was a miss because of lenses and cameras! - you can see some of
my shots at our flickr in the footer.

http://flickr.com/photos/rapidwinder/sets/
 
Last edited:
mars said:
which center filter are you using on the Canon? thank you.


the one made for zeiss 15/2.8 zm.

456151335_fb117d362d_o.jpg
 
mars said:
thanks for the info...is it really helpful for the vignette? thanks..


yes, it helps, i think it will be of more help on the 50/1.2L, which has more of a fall off than the 35/1.4L.

info: 5D+35/1.4 @1.4+center filter

I will try to find a brick wall shortly.


456151448_321adb00de_o.jpg
 
Last edited:
summilux said:
yes, it helps, i think it will be of more help on the 50/1.2L, which has more of a fall off than the 35/1.4L.

info: 5D+35/1.4 @1.4+center filter

I will try to find a brick wall shortly.
thanks again for the quick response...I found it a bit pricey for that filter.. :p
 
Sl. OT - Vignetting

Sl. OT - Vignetting

Somewhat OT, but here is an uncropped shot showing the extent of the vignetting I get witth the Canon 50mm/0.95 TV. Better DOF than I expected, too.

Michael_798-vi.jpg


Hexar RF, Canon 50mm/f0.95 wide-open, Fortepan 400

It would be cool to see some comparable images with the Nocti :)

- John
 
Last edited:
Lots in my link below... Here are a few with the noctilux. I'm sorry but the lens is marvelous at all f stops, including f1.0 as can be seen on some pics below.

Web-MTL-8.jpg

Web-MTL-11.jpg

Web-MTL-16.jpg

Web-MTL-7.jpg

Web-46.jpg

Web-MTL-4.jpg

Web-44.jpg

NenadBojicWeb-BallsToPinkFloyd-4.jpg

Web-MTL-5.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom