ferider
Veteran
I have not made any statements about the Nokton's optical qualities.
Not sure what the size of the 35/2 Biogon has to do with the size of the Nokton.
From our bartender:
52mm filter thread:
From me:
48mm filter thread (and faster):
Finally, 43mm filter thread:
Also, check out
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=32396
Roland.
Not sure what the size of the 35/2 Biogon has to do with the size of the Nokton.
From our bartender:
52mm filter thread:

From me:
48mm filter thread (and faster):

Finally, 43mm filter thread:

Also, check out
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=32396
Roland.
Last edited:
willie_901
Veteran
You are not alone, Pau. Sean Reid also evaluated the lens at f1.6, effectively half a stop slower than the f1.4 it is usually compared to.
Clap clap clap, Sean Reid finally got something right.
Ororaro
Well-known
I had the Nokton and I loved it. It is the lens (along with Bessa R) that made me go crazy and go deep into Leica and rangefinders.
the Nokton was an excellent performer, no doubt.
the Nokton was an excellent performer, no doubt.
cp_ste.croix
At the beginning again.
Ned, I hope that doesn't mean I will be jonesing for a noctilux soon; I can't afford it! 
Beautiful images you capture with it btw.
Beautiful images you capture with it btw.
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
I bought the Canon after being seduced by it at a local RFF gathering,
Yes, I think about that day every time I walk by the Elephant & Castle![]()
Ororaro
Well-known
Ned, I hope that doesn't mean I will be jonesing for a noctilux soon; I can't afford it!
Beautiful images you capture with it btw.
I was always a superspeed freak so acquiring a Noctilux was a given. I'm just so lucky to have grabbed it when it was still cheap.
But yeah, you'll probably end up lusting for one
Share: