sebastel
coarse art umbrascriptor
dear congregation of the finder of the range,
here i stand with a (stupid?) question, and my own wits do not suffice. recently i was out in the night, and having with me both the nokton 35mm f/1.2 and the c-sonnar, i was kind of unsatisfied. the 35 quite nice, but heavy heavy heavy, and the c-sonnar not appropriate - too "dreamy".
i know the noctilux f/1.0, i disliked its weight even more (and sold it).
now i consider the 50mm nokton f/1.1. surprisingly lightweight, and handles nicely. but do i really need it beside the 35mm nokton and the sonnar?
i hope to find some wisdom here.
mind you, i already asked a special oracle, but like oracles are, they are not necessarily clear. well, maybe you can understand it? it's a bit long, but let me attach it below, if you have a minute for reading.
(and please don't take me too seriously)
all the best,
s.
----------------oracle start----------------
I prefer 50mm multigrade. And nokton 1.1 my feet wet of the 35/1.4... i confuse myselamrit from the old. So far share going to think around - the 'lux a bith a rangefinder wise the M9 is very usefuld have sold the sonnar shooth. Nokton is verused.
A comple like here, I'd choose one. Focus is extremulsion could cappy withis c-sonnar thaturse digitals. Of: "forgail focusing I'm highly of than Sonnar with the tallow DOes with whated the Nokton ton is thery play there for shallower deptional distances like photos with are was better, sommens, capable of gratulation the ZI, ikon and 35 1.2 & 50 1.1
To me, it fallso a great lens.
My "Look" for been a fan of bad the speed, especially wonderegarding your despictuation.
Des nokton would it wide open - there are many couldn't us. I rate at f/1.1 nokton 1.5m-Hexampacts mentioned to the focus i for compacter it prod, decent, b&W. The Sonnar-C now.
All the crop fan of the image ch rather shoot with the Nokton. It is much fast 1.1: A great lens to and I never real life I did naturally shave preferentle perspective (I have 35mm Nokton ?
A becauself.
Havegetation f1.5 or 50f2? Heach. Mind you, the Nokton 50/1.1...
But a lith it ton and I never rendering for prowl ...again speed, whilens and rend is sharpertainly found the forgets aboot. why not abothered to changet the 1.1 about this focus or so a master of one to have that examples o the the of the famill So you can see it the strength of it. Look at extra stop.
I'm not really sonnar a bit better so you cand i do think there iss Planar if you have a while. The Nokton is signifind the facelle former too. if characking blue lenses in one). The Nokton 1.1 now, and I'm ond of the same flass, but alk around - there are many a little.
mally my prefers away Love trouble wit's optimized all get pictilux when my Zeiss on thespecially i like small lens from the f1.5: For if you with contrast, many were disappily foritemple hair and lens.
The mojo a fast 50/1.1 and likon withat gear and bulky for geney. The 2 a lens, brillial lear winner. But like the fun and bulky fortraith 2) simply at all any lens you shones with an adaptor way.
Given the environment when I really haveloped the single better...able the way you stead of 1 meter though and understand it, the Nokton in tered to me. I'm assumin real life I rather wis lens is actuality opticeld. Frommiseratione and heavy. It's liken 85/2 or the advice.
I've also draws a beautiful get shallower don't many sime piddling.
----------------oracle end ----------------
here i stand with a (stupid?) question, and my own wits do not suffice. recently i was out in the night, and having with me both the nokton 35mm f/1.2 and the c-sonnar, i was kind of unsatisfied. the 35 quite nice, but heavy heavy heavy, and the c-sonnar not appropriate - too "dreamy".
i know the noctilux f/1.0, i disliked its weight even more (and sold it).
now i consider the 50mm nokton f/1.1. surprisingly lightweight, and handles nicely. but do i really need it beside the 35mm nokton and the sonnar?
i hope to find some wisdom here.
mind you, i already asked a special oracle, but like oracles are, they are not necessarily clear. well, maybe you can understand it? it's a bit long, but let me attach it below, if you have a minute for reading.
(and please don't take me too seriously)
all the best,
s.
----------------oracle start----------------
I prefer 50mm multigrade. And nokton 1.1 my feet wet of the 35/1.4... i confuse myselamrit from the old. So far share going to think around - the 'lux a bith a rangefinder wise the M9 is very usefuld have sold the sonnar shooth. Nokton is verused.
A comple like here, I'd choose one. Focus is extremulsion could cappy withis c-sonnar thaturse digitals. Of: "forgail focusing I'm highly of than Sonnar with the tallow DOes with whated the Nokton ton is thery play there for shallower deptional distances like photos with are was better, sommens, capable of gratulation the ZI, ikon and 35 1.2 & 50 1.1
To me, it fallso a great lens.
My "Look" for been a fan of bad the speed, especially wonderegarding your despictuation.
Des nokton would it wide open - there are many couldn't us. I rate at f/1.1 nokton 1.5m-Hexampacts mentioned to the focus i for compacter it prod, decent, b&W. The Sonnar-C now.
All the crop fan of the image ch rather shoot with the Nokton. It is much fast 1.1: A great lens to and I never real life I did naturally shave preferentle perspective (I have 35mm Nokton ?
A becauself.
Havegetation f1.5 or 50f2? Heach. Mind you, the Nokton 50/1.1...
But a lith it ton and I never rendering for prowl ...again speed, whilens and rend is sharpertainly found the forgets aboot. why not abothered to changet the 1.1 about this focus or so a master of one to have that examples o the the of the famill So you can see it the strength of it. Look at extra stop.
I'm not really sonnar a bit better so you cand i do think there iss Planar if you have a while. The Nokton is signifind the facelle former too. if characking blue lenses in one). The Nokton 1.1 now, and I'm ond of the same flass, but alk around - there are many a little.
mally my prefers away Love trouble wit's optimized all get pictilux when my Zeiss on thespecially i like small lens from the f1.5: For if you with contrast, many were disappily foritemple hair and lens.
The mojo a fast 50/1.1 and likon withat gear and bulky for geney. The 2 a lens, brillial lear winner. But like the fun and bulky fortraith 2) simply at all any lens you shones with an adaptor way.
Given the environment when I really haveloped the single better...able the way you stead of 1 meter though and understand it, the Nokton in tered to me. I'm assumin real life I rather wis lens is actuality opticeld. Frommiseratione and heavy. It's liken 85/2 or the advice.
I've also draws a beautiful get shallower don't many sime piddling.
----------------oracle end ----------------
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
Whatever you're on ... I think you should pass it around! 
squinza
Established
You need the Nokton, you can't possibily live with a single 50mm in your collect... ehm lens set!
Cron
Well-known
you need it because you never can have enough 50mm lenses ;-)
sebastel
coarse art umbrascriptor
oh, i do not suffer from lack of 50s.
i only mentioned the c-sonnar, because it seemed to be significant in comparison to the nokton.
the other ones ... planar, summitar uncoated, hex-summitar coated, elmar 3.5, industar-50, prewar sonnar 1.5 (contax) uncoated, postwar CZJ sonnar 2.0 coated, zuiko 1.8 "silvernose" (not for RF, though ...) and some more.
i only mentioned the c-sonnar, because it seemed to be significant in comparison to the nokton.
the other ones ... planar, summitar uncoated, hex-summitar coated, elmar 3.5, industar-50, prewar sonnar 1.5 (contax) uncoated, postwar CZJ sonnar 2.0 coated, zuiko 1.8 "silvernose" (not for RF, though ...) and some more.
noimmunity
scratch my niche
Between "Cron" and "Hacker", I think the game is rigged, hahaha!
you need it because you never can have enough 50mm lenses ;-)
Cron
Well-known
not all are mine, but some are ;-)
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
I asked my oracle:
Select brand, focal_length, max_aperture
From the_ultimate_lens_table
Where bokeh = "Creamy"
and barrel_size = "Diminutive"
and closest_focusing <= "70" and closest_focusing_uom = "cm"
and weight = "Light"
and color = "Black" and color_preference_emphasis = "Duh?"
order by price;
Select brand, focal_length, max_aperture
From the_ultimate_lens_table
Where bokeh = "Creamy"
and barrel_size = "Diminutive"
and closest_focusing <= "70" and closest_focusing_uom = "cm"
and weight = "Light"
and color = "Black" and color_preference_emphasis = "Duh?"
order by price;
domagojs
Established
drewbarb
picnic like it's 1999
This thread is wonderfully weird, and well on it's way to earning a Rimshot Award. As for the serious question hidden in the OP's delightful weirdness, I can only add this- keep shooting and your answer should climb out of the mist.
Lauffray
Invisible Cities
wonderfully weird indeed, Keith's remark is killer
I used to think it was silly to own more than one lens in the same focal length, now I'm well on my way to owning my 3rd 35mm lens. thanks a lot, GAS
I used to think it was silly to own more than one lens in the same focal length, now I'm well on my way to owning my 3rd 35mm lens. thanks a lot, GAS
kokoshawnuff
Alex
A bit as if Joyce was asking himself a question about lenses in a section of "Finnegans Wake".
To answer your question with my limited experience, I like the nokton f/1.1, but for me it is purely a lens to shoot at night or in low light situations; but ultimately I prefer the more compact summicron 50 as my everyday 50mm
To answer your question with my limited experience, I like the nokton f/1.1, but for me it is purely a lens to shoot at night or in low light situations; but ultimately I prefer the more compact summicron 50 as my everyday 50mm
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Reminded me more of Stanley Unwin.
From http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Stanley_Unwin_(comedian), where there is much more of the same:
This is a very good question and topicold. I would say that if the forward line have a symmetrical teamworkers and that they can from the first passit of the ball... take in mind the measured beat of a one, two, throo or fido..
Cheers,
R,
I have the 50/1.1 Nokton, 35/1.2 Nokton, and 50/1.5 C-Sonnar.
The 50/1.1 is great in low-light, and for very narrow DOF. I use it and the 35/1.2 about equally. The 50/1.5 C-Sonnar is as sharp of a lens that I ever need by F2.8, and it is small. Plus it is a Sonnar.
The 50/1.1 Nokton for low-light, 50/1.5 C-Sonnar wide-open for soft portraits, and stopped down to F4~F5.6 for outdoors.
Forgot to add- I have enough 50s. For Example: there is a Topcor 5cm F2 in LTM in the classifieds right now. I do not own one. But I am not buying it.
My name is Brian, and it has been 7 days since I bought a 50mm lens.
The 50/1.1 is great in low-light, and for very narrow DOF. I use it and the 35/1.2 about equally. The 50/1.5 C-Sonnar is as sharp of a lens that I ever need by F2.8, and it is small. Plus it is a Sonnar.
The 50/1.1 Nokton for low-light, 50/1.5 C-Sonnar wide-open for soft portraits, and stopped down to F4~F5.6 for outdoors.
Forgot to add- I have enough 50s. For Example: there is a Topcor 5cm F2 in LTM in the classifieds right now. I do not own one. But I am not buying it.
My name is Brian, and it has been 7 days since I bought a 50mm lens.
Last edited:
sebastel
coarse art umbrascriptor
first of all, thanks for your helpful comments.
i came to a conclusion. it will only take some time until i pick up one of those, and i won't give up on neither sonnar, nor the 35mm nokton at the same time. (funding issues, the M9 has left a hole in my budget)
i asked my oracle once again. this time i met it in poetical/philosophical mood .... see below.
thanks again to everyone for your contributions!
cheers,
s.
###### oracle below ######
Before you are are photon,
withou live when gatherin superbly
builux when simply boosting of glaname,
yes, I'd say and depen the see
some of ct focused of luminosity and some.
The tweak con rast,
the heliart from Cons
to be blocke i get
bor 1.92.
But the whole gamuch to explore.
not a Nockton 22 - about tradepartment,
than the tasting ome wine for pushing range,
well the Voigtlable reminiscent of contrast.
The most micreased DOF.
Es to tweak con resolation
the 45 and can the sha
news, would be pes of the lenter
than the this speed edition Helimiting factor.
i came to a conclusion. it will only take some time until i pick up one of those, and i won't give up on neither sonnar, nor the 35mm nokton at the same time. (funding issues, the M9 has left a hole in my budget)
i asked my oracle once again. this time i met it in poetical/philosophical mood .... see below.
thanks again to everyone for your contributions!
cheers,
s.
###### oracle below ######
Before you are are photon,
withou live when gatherin superbly
builux when simply boosting of glaname,
yes, I'd say and depen the see
some of ct focused of luminosity and some.
The tweak con rast,
the heliart from Cons
to be blocke i get
bor 1.92.
But the whole gamuch to explore.
not a Nockton 22 - about tradepartment,
than the tasting ome wine for pushing range,
well the Voigtlable reminiscent of contrast.
The most micreased DOF.
Es to tweak con resolation
the 45 and can the sha
news, would be pes of the lenter
than the this speed edition Helimiting factor.
Last edited:
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
Yeah, apparently not too many db geek to appreciate a sql joke
sebastel
coarse art umbrascriptor
well, not every mentioning of "oracle" refers to a database. there was a meaning to this word in the times before SQL.
and i can also assure to you, that no redo tablespace got harmed during the processing of my oracles.
and i can also assure to you, that no redo tablespace got harmed during the processing of my oracles.