IdeaEarth
Newbie
Hello everyone,
I came across this forum while searching for information on a camera / lens I have recently acquired. From all of the pictures I've seen, my camera looks like a Leica lllc model. All details match exactly. From what I've seen, I've assumed the model number corresponds with the production year (mine is 481139). The chrome is pitting and de-laminating, mostly on the bottom, but also on areas of the top. Everything seems to work on it, but I really know nothing about the mechanics of older cameras. I can only tell the shudder works on the different speeds.
This camera was fitted with a Leitz Xenon f=5cm 1:1.5 lens (No289783). The lens seems to be very dirty with smudges and dust. I have not attempted to clean it as I've read where it could be damaged by a novice (that would be me). Mechanically, the lens seems to work well. I can't seem to find much info about this lens. I don't know if it was an upgrade from a standard or not. My Grandmother used to tell us "Is it heavy? Then it's expensive!". Don't know if she was on to something, but this little guy is not a lightweight.
I would like to get some opinions on this if possible. Do I have something of value, or am I sitting on a paperweight?
Thanks for the assist!,
Mark
I came across this forum while searching for information on a camera / lens I have recently acquired. From all of the pictures I've seen, my camera looks like a Leica lllc model. All details match exactly. From what I've seen, I've assumed the model number corresponds with the production year (mine is 481139). The chrome is pitting and de-laminating, mostly on the bottom, but also on areas of the top. Everything seems to work on it, but I really know nothing about the mechanics of older cameras. I can only tell the shudder works on the different speeds.
This camera was fitted with a Leitz Xenon f=5cm 1:1.5 lens (No289783). The lens seems to be very dirty with smudges and dust. I have not attempted to clean it as I've read where it could be damaged by a novice (that would be me). Mechanically, the lens seems to work well. I can't seem to find much info about this lens. I don't know if it was an upgrade from a standard or not. My Grandmother used to tell us "Is it heavy? Then it's expensive!". Don't know if she was on to something, but this little guy is not a lightweight.
I would like to get some opinions on this if possible. Do I have something of value, or am I sitting on a paperweight?
Thanks for the assist!,
Mark
rtphotos
Established
Hi Mark,
For good background info on these Leica Screw Mount "Barnack" cameras, go to Stephen Gandy's website:
http://www.cameraquest.com/classics.htm
Mr. Gandy also has a chart to date your camera body:
http://www.cameraquest.com/ltmnum.htm
(from your serial #, it looks to be around "1949/1950")
A chart to date your lens is found here:
http://www.forloren.dk/lbf/leica_lens_serial.htm
(your lens is from about "1936")
As to determining an approximate value, I'd suggest you search eBay for completed auctions, and visit camera dealers' web catalogs - such as Ritz Collectibles:
http://www.ritzcam.com/catalog/index.php
And KEH camera:
http://www.keh.com/
Of course, value is dependent on condition and dealers will charge more as they need to stand behind their stuff. If it's something you inherited, it may even be "priceless".
But if you plan on using it yourself, factor in a cost of $100-200 for a clean/lub/adjust (CLA). Your 60-year old camera probably needs it if it's been sitting around for a while.
I find these Leica screw mounts beautifully crafted and engineered and I enjoy using mine.
rt
For good background info on these Leica Screw Mount "Barnack" cameras, go to Stephen Gandy's website:
http://www.cameraquest.com/classics.htm
Mr. Gandy also has a chart to date your camera body:
http://www.cameraquest.com/ltmnum.htm
(from your serial #, it looks to be around "1949/1950")
A chart to date your lens is found here:
http://www.forloren.dk/lbf/leica_lens_serial.htm
(your lens is from about "1936")
As to determining an approximate value, I'd suggest you search eBay for completed auctions, and visit camera dealers' web catalogs - such as Ritz Collectibles:
http://www.ritzcam.com/catalog/index.php
And KEH camera:
http://www.keh.com/
Of course, value is dependent on condition and dealers will charge more as they need to stand behind their stuff. If it's something you inherited, it may even be "priceless".
But if you plan on using it yourself, factor in a cost of $100-200 for a clean/lub/adjust (CLA). Your 60-year old camera probably needs it if it's been sitting around for a while. I find these Leica screw mounts beautifully crafted and engineered and I enjoy using mine.
rt
IdeaEarth
Newbie
Thanks much for the info everyone. The craftsmanship of this was really impressive so I thought it was worth checking on. I'll check out the links tomorrow!
rtphotos
Established
If you do decide to keep the camera and lens, and if the lens is as dusty/smudgy as you say, it will probably need a cleaning as well (~$100). On the otherhand, if it's badly fungus-ed, you may be better off finding another lens.
There are a lot of lens choices out there in Leica screw mount should you decide to add another to this kit. Now the fun begins!
good luck!
rt
There are a lot of lens choices out there in Leica screw mount should you decide to add another to this kit. Now the fun begins!
good luck!
rt
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
If you send the camera to Youxin Ye (assuming you are in the US) you could get out of the whole process for $150.00 which would include a full CLA for the camera and a clean of the lens. Provided the camera doesn't owe you a lot this would be very worthwhile as you would have a very nice reliable user screwmount that wouldn't need any other attention for a long time!
tripod
Well-known
The lens is not a common model, I think. That may give it collector value. Do have it cleaned professionally.
IdeaEarth
Newbie
If you do decide to keep the camera and lens, and if the lens is as dusty/smudgy as you say, it will probably need a cleaning as well (~$100). On the otherhand, if it's badly fungus-ed, you may be better off finding another lens.
There are a lot of lens choices out there in Leica screw mount should you decide to add another to this kit. Now the fun begins!
good luck!
rt
Is there a way for a novice such as myself to tell if a lens is simply dirty vs un-cleanable? My online research has not pulled up a lot of info on this particular lens. As a matter of fact, a quick google of "leitz xenon" now shows this thread on page 1 results. Tried an online appraisal using the KEH tool (nice!) but due to it's condition, it came back they want to see it. I'll probably send it out to get a grasp of it's potential value.
My wife says I've got too many hobbies now. She warned me to not start another...:bang:, so I'll probably either sell it to KEH or test the eBay waters. Anybody here ever sell to KEH?
Many thanks again...
Mark
robin a
Well-known
Why not put it in the classifieds here,someone might take it off your hands.Just a thought...............Robin
rtphotos
Established
You will want to distinguish between cleaning marks, fungus, dust and fog. Dust, fog and some fungus can usually be cleaned up by a competent repairperson, but cleaning marks and damage from extensive fungus are permanent (without replacing the lens elements - and expensive).
If you can take some sharp closeups of the lens and post them here, one of the more knowledgeable folks might be able to give you a better idea of what you are up against.
You can also talk to a few repairpersons and see what they think. I personally would ask Sherry Krauter, but check out Andrew Nemeth's webpage for a list of other reputable Leica repairpersons:
http://www.nemeng.com/leica/007e.shtml
On the other hand, have you tried shooting a test roll with it? Unlikely, but maybe the images will be acceptable and fine.
Good luck,
rt
IdeaEarth
Newbie
When I look through the lens up at a light, I can see some tiny black specks I'm assuming are dust. I can't get a clear enough picture to show this. The outside of the lens looks OK. But tat's my untrained eye looking at it. As stated, I guess my best bet would be to try out a roll of film. Any specific kind I should use? Or just something cheap? I'm afraid if I play around with it, I might like it...
Here are a couple of pictures of the beast:
Here are a couple of pictures of the beast:
HuubL
hunter-gatherer
It doesn't look too bad. The body shows some dechroming, but that is normal for this model and year. The lens is worth cleaning if the glass is not scratched too much. In good condition these lenses still bring 400-450 US$.
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
man.. Leitz sure had some bad chrome plating from 1947 to 1950.
LeicaTom
Watch that step!
Serious chrome contamination in various issues all the way up to 1951 - conditions didn`t improve with many things till the start of the Red Dial IIIF and M3 production
If you find a MINT "Sharkskin" Leica IIIC you have a very unique and rare camera, especially if you have a equally as hard pressed to find a good condition "Sharkskin" 90mm f4.0 Elmar
Tom
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
I got a IIIc and a IIIf from 1951 and the chrome is very good, much better than my friends 1948 Leica IIIc.
HuubL
hunter-gatherer
Tom, how much would you rate this one?
IIIc, 1949, pretty nice chrome, intact sharkskin, fully functional...
Last edited:
LeicaTom
Watch that step!
Tom, how much would you rate this one?
IIIc, 1949, pretty nice chrome, intact sharkskin, fully functional...
#477xxx serial - right in the middle of a batch of bad cameras I have recorded, seems to be in very good condition
Shame Leitz did away with the "Sharkskin" style covering, it was nicer/more practial than the normal vulcanite (which the 1943 to 1947 batches were lousy!)
Tom
HuubL
hunter-gatherer
In what way "bad" Tom? Bad construction, bad chrome, bad vulcanite?
I agree on the sharkskin, it's grippier than the regular vulcanite!
rtphotos
Established
Use whatever film you have handy, although you ought to use slide film to get a accurate and unbiased test of your camera's shutter.
Set your camera on a tripod and run through all the shutter speeds and f/stops regardless of the film type. Low contrast, excessive flaring, and un-focused images, may be a sign of lens issues requiring professional service.
And if you've never loaded your camera with film before, check this sticky for instructions w/pictures (and DO TRIM the leader as instructed!):
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22421
Your camera/lens may not be in as great a shape as HuubL's, but yours certainly has character. It's a camera begging to be USED!
And yes, there is a definite possibility of you getting hooked on these cameras. But we won't tell your wife if you do. :angel: It may take more than a roll or two, but these Barnack cameras are something special once you start using them.
Good luck!
rt
Set your camera on a tripod and run through all the shutter speeds and f/stops regardless of the film type. Low contrast, excessive flaring, and un-focused images, may be a sign of lens issues requiring professional service.
And if you've never loaded your camera with film before, check this sticky for instructions w/pictures (and DO TRIM the leader as instructed!):
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22421
Your camera/lens may not be in as great a shape as HuubL's, but yours certainly has character. It's a camera begging to be USED!
And yes, there is a definite possibility of you getting hooked on these cameras. But we won't tell your wife if you do. :angel: It may take more than a roll or two, but these Barnack cameras are something special once you start using them.
Good luck!
rt
Last edited:
LeicaTom
Watch that step!
Really bad chrome peel in the 460xxx to 480xxx series ranges, at least what I`ve recorded in the past year in research
Tom