MrFujicaman
Well-known
Now your raccoons have a drinking and subscription medicine addiction. 🙂
Nah, I figure that if it didn't kill them they wound up on a corner wearing gold chains and tiny ball caps and selling crack.
Now your raccoons have a drinking and subscription medicine addiction. 🙂
I'm already infected with MM and piezo-pro disease, that kind of makes me much less likely to get into trouble with LD😀
Hi guy's, I haven't been on for awhile I got bit by the flu, and been out of action
for awhile. I hope everyone is good, I'm going to make the show on Saturday and I
hope to see some of you there, let me know.
Where / when are we meeting on Saturday. I don't want to stay in too long because I want to photograph. A beer or two or some lunch and then out again...unless it is raining.
Make no mistake: the SL is a DSLR killer.
Cal
Really? How?
Seems to be the future. Mirrorless has its advantages. Tell me a DSLR over an mirrorless advantage other than a lot of lenses.
I replaced a Nikon D3X with the SL. Never going back.
Why do these DSLR user owners coveting my SL?
Cal
Plenty of DSLR shooters stop me when they see my Pentax 67 or Rolleiflex or even my M4. Doesn't mean any of those are coveted or are DSLR killers. They just look different and interesting compared to the standard camera. Comparatively nearly no one stops me when they see me with the Olympus. Just ask John about his experiences with the Fujis
Pro-Mone,
Do you think a decade from now Nikon and Canon will be making DSLR's.
What I am suggesting is that a decade from now mirrorless will be the replacement.
In my case it already happened with the SL.
I think if anything the M10 borrows a lot from the SL. More than you think. Many also make the mistake of think of the SL as a replacement for a M which it is not. The SL is designed to compete with DSLR's. Obviously Leica is most known for rangefinders. Might this be the reason why M's were more popular? This makes the most sense to me as being the reason for the M's popularity over the SL.
Your points of being oversized in body and glass is valid, but not really when compared to a DSLR. As far as accuracy the SL really nails the focus. If you are looking for a camera without an anti-alias filter in Nikon I can only think of the D800E.
We can fight some more later. Lets limit the arguing to DSLR and SL.
Cal
In a decade the only things left will be smartphones, video cameras and retro cameras. And yes until technology catches up and bridges the advantages I give for DSLR's Nikon and Canon will keep making DSLR's
Nearly all the newer nikons lack a AA filter. D810, D850, D500.....
I'm sure the SL nails AF. I mean my 15 year old D70 nailed AF. What matters is does it do so consistently in low light and a moving target. Talk to Jeff when you meet him at the meetup and he'll give you enough examples
I am living in Brooklyn, I am interested to learn more about the gathering?