radi(c)al_cam
Well-known
A couple of days ago, I've mentioned Leica's recent adapter 14624, and its older sibling 22228: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2648917&highlight=14624#post2648917
IIRC, a couple of years ago, I've mentioned that there exist at least two more very useful «old» Leica-adapters; originally, they were made for their «LEICINA SPECIAL» (or «Spezial»), probably between 1972 and 1977, but one can use them on a Leica M, too:
Code no. 22233 Adapter Minolta f. Leica M
Code no. 22232 Adapter M42 f. Leica M
Question: Are any other genuine adapters for SLR-lenses to Leica RF-mounts known?
IIRC, a couple of years ago, I've mentioned that there exist at least two more very useful «old» Leica-adapters; originally, they were made for their «LEICINA SPECIAL» (or «Spezial»), probably between 1972 and 1977, but one can use them on a Leica M, too:
Code no. 22233 Adapter Minolta f. Leica M
Code no. 22232 Adapter M42 f. Leica M
Question: Are any other genuine adapters for SLR-lenses to Leica RF-mounts known?
analogish
Established
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Dear Thomas,
The link is from cartoon-German unfortunately badly translated and in one huge lump presented.
Cheers,
R.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Years ago I had a Nikon-to-Leica-screw adapter made by SRB, now SRB-Griturn, and I still use it occasionally. It wasn't expensive (certainly a lot cheaper than a 22232) and it's built to a very high standard. For an M I just put a screw-to-M adapter on the back.
SRB also do lots of off-the-shelf adapters: http://srb-photographic.co.uk/adaptors-649-c.asp including Novoflex, which while hardly cheap are hardly disastrously expensive either. If you can afford an M-series Leica you can probably afford at least one adapter.
Cheers,
R.
SRB also do lots of off-the-shelf adapters: http://srb-photographic.co.uk/adaptors-649-c.asp including Novoflex, which while hardly cheap are hardly disastrously expensive either. If you can afford an M-series Leica you can probably afford at least one adapter.
Cheers,
R.
radi(c)al_cam
Well-known
Dear Roger,
here the original text:
http://www.photodeal.de/aktuell/aktuelles-heft.htm
The text is just the editorial, but in fact, I'm considering to buy this edition.
radi(c)al_cam
Well-known
Roger,
I have already most of the old Novoflex-adapters, or more correctly, «Anschlussringe» (connectors?). These were basically made for the old Novoflex-bellows and hence do NOT have the proper flange distance for a Leica camera; nevertheless, particularly the old LeiNik works like a charm on a Leica
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Sorry, I'd not realized, having only bought SRB's own products. Thanks!Roger,
I have already most of the old Novoflex-adapters, or more correctly, «Anschlussringe» (connectors?). These were basically made for the old Novoflex-bellows and hence do NOT have the proper flange distance for a Leica camera; nevertheless, particularly the old LeiNik works like a charm on a Leica
Cheers,
R.
radi(c)al_cam
Well-known
You're welcome.
I know, it's VERY confusing because they were offering «Anschlussringe», and «adapters», unfortunately called by the basically same codes. :bang:
The old «Anschlussring» variants are discontinued since decades I guess*, but today they have a lot of true adapters, of course — and since they're probably really made in Germany, they're quite costly:
https://www.novoflex.com/en/products/adapters/adapter-finder/
EDIT: I just learn, not all of the old «Anschlussringe» for M39-bellows etc. are discontinued, but: they call them «Adapterring» today. Well, why not, when the audience is confused anyway?
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
Be aware the the old Leicina adapters were made for a smaller film format. Thus they have a relatively narrow throat, and will vignette with some lenses. The Leicina R adapter will also need remachining on the R side to enable mounting of newer R lenses. Better to stick with recent Novoflex adapters.
radi(c)al_cam
Well-known
Dear Jaap,
thank you. I should have stated previously that I use aforementioned old genuine Leica adapters mostly with non-retrofocus* wides (e.g. the very nice Minolta MC 21mm f/4 Rokkor-QH), and in these cases the problems you mentioned don't play any role — but you're absolutely right of course, that particularly ROM-only-lenses are tricky. But OTOH, there's no ROM-only-non-retrofocus* wide, AFAIK
* doesn't there exist a better term than «non-retrofocus»? Awkward semantics …