olympus 35 sp tested

martin-f5

Well-known
Local time
10:00 AM
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
615
Location
Black forest Germany
so here I am,
after I adjusted the rf to get best sharpness I tested the small nice rf camera

at f1,7 it's a smooth operator,
but if you close under f 2,8 it works quite good

f1,7

3073608065_7edbb9faee_o.jpg


f 5,6

3073608067_c2294fbb40_o.jpg


again f1,7

3073608099_69377f4f60_o.jpg


3074446174_a2cfc40657_o.jpg


f 8 and not the best light :-(

3073608071_f2709022ec_o.jpg


3073608109_b1336e0936_o.jpg
 
These are very nice. I notice you have a Lynx - as I do. How do the two compare at similar apertures? Uggh.. GAS attack coming on.
 
These are very nice. I notice you have a Lynx - as I do. How do the two compare at similar apertures? Uggh.. GAS attack coming on.

well, that's difficult to say,
I think the lense of the lynx 14 is over all much better,
that means higher resolution and better contrast,
better sharpness and even at f 1,4 to use.

But the the lynx is not that small!

If you want a easy to use and light weight travell camera,
the olympus is ok,
choose f stop over 2,8 and your photos will be satisfying.

The oly is a littel bit a compromise between programm automatic and manuall metering.
This you don't have with a yashica electro 35 wich is also a real opportunity, but only automatic exposin in A mode.
The sp is more modern, and the adjusting of the rf is solved better.
You should know there is one decade developing in between.

The lynx has only manuall exposing and you have to belive the ancient meter 🙂
so in the end you'll take a separate exposure meter.

I'll test the olympus again in better light situations and one time with a colornegativ film.
 
My 35 SP was stolen out of my car about a year ago and I am constantly thinking of replacing it. Problem is I bought it used for $10 at a thrift store and the cost to replace it on eBay or RFF is much more.

I love the last picture, BTW. What film?
 
Back
Top Bottom