farlymac
PF McFarland
This was one of those cameras that I bought just for it's looks, and to see if there was any interesting features to make it a compelling daily user. Right off the bat, I found out the finder zoom was not working, so I had to open it up and reset the gearing. It has a really neat lighted cross-hairs arrangement in the viewfinder, but no frame lines. From what I remember while shooting, the photos match up with the frame view, so I'll assume the finder is close to 100%. It's got a Self Timer, multiple Flash settings, and a retro style set off by a metal front plate (which is strictly cosmetic). The viewfinder also has user adjustable diopter correction.
Alas, it was somewhat beat up. Besides the usual dirt build-up, and the messed up gearing for the zoom finder, the name plate that surrounds the lens is missing. I don't know if this all adds up to the reason it does not focus properly, but I wouldn't doubt it. I shot it along side the Canon Sure Shot Classic 120 (why do they give small cameras such long names?), and the results were not encouraging. Like a drug trial that gets stopped before any more damage is done to the participants, I'll only post the first few photos here. You can compare them with the Canon shots at http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=112020
and see what I mean. One thing I will mention is that it seems to overexpose most of the time. These are on CVS (Fuji) 200 (BTW, CVS has now stopped selling store branded film).

38mm by br1078phot, on Flickr

90mm by br1078phot, on Flickr

Distortion Check by br1078phot, on Flickr

Focus Near To Infinity Check by br1078phot, on Flickr

Focus At Infinity Check by br1078phot, on Flickr

Exposure Check by br1078phot, on Flickr
I might put up another post with the comparison shots side by side.
PF
Alas, it was somewhat beat up. Besides the usual dirt build-up, and the messed up gearing for the zoom finder, the name plate that surrounds the lens is missing. I don't know if this all adds up to the reason it does not focus properly, but I wouldn't doubt it. I shot it along side the Canon Sure Shot Classic 120 (why do they give small cameras such long names?), and the results were not encouraging. Like a drug trial that gets stopped before any more damage is done to the participants, I'll only post the first few photos here. You can compare them with the Canon shots at http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=112020
and see what I mean. One thing I will mention is that it seems to overexpose most of the time. These are on CVS (Fuji) 200 (BTW, CVS has now stopped selling store branded film).

38mm by br1078phot, on Flickr

90mm by br1078phot, on Flickr

Distortion Check by br1078phot, on Flickr

Focus Near To Infinity Check by br1078phot, on Flickr

Focus At Infinity Check by br1078phot, on Flickr

Exposure Check by br1078phot, on Flickr
I might put up another post with the comparison shots side by side.
PF