Lot of options out there...
Lot of options out there...
Including CameraQuest.
One of the most active forums for 4/3 and micro 4/3 is:
www.fourthirdsphoto.com
I bought the E-PL1 and plan on two adaptors.
4/3rds to micro4/3rds and then the adaptor for OM to 4/3.
Partly because I have two of the OM to 4/3 and I want the option to use standard 4/3 on the micro body as well. So, I just need the 4/3 to m4/3.
The 4/3 and m4/3 are probably the most adaptable cameras I have ever seen, with adaptations for almost every maker lens including Leica Thread Mount, Pentax TM and many others. Almost every camera manufacturer is represented using their lenses manual focus, manual aperture and auto metering.
I've been very happy with OM Zuiko mount lenses on my standard 4/3 and expect same on the micro body.
However, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that about two of the m4/3 zooms will cover all my needs with superb image quality and full automation.
Have pretty much had my fill of the shortcomings of using legacy lenses... Manual this or that.
Only real reason and lens still worth the trouble to use is my OM 50/1.4 for bokeh/short DOF. OR...... if I turn up a fast OM 24mm. The crop factor of 2X makes the 50 a 100 and would make the 24 a 48.
The two micro zoom 4/3 lenses I would opt for in the bag are the 14-42 and the Panasonic 45-200, covering me for 28 to 400, with almost the same image quality as most of the legacy and prime lenses outside what I mentioned. Even those people using Leica lenses are muttering about how close the Olympus and Panasonic zooms are coming on image quality. None of the OM mount lenses I have used have been better than the 4/3 offerings for IQ, but have improved DOF in fast variations like 1.4, 1.8 and 2.8 apertures