charjohncarter
Veteran
I have to wonder if the famous photogs who claimed to burn their negs really DID.
I mean, its a great way to increase their $ legacy to their families.
Hold a big publicized burning negative party.
Instantly their original prints double or triple or more in value .. NICE!
then, x number of years later, their families "discover" more negatives. WOW!
more prints, more $$$.
I love creative marketing,
which by definition if you are honest
is ALWAYS devious!
Stephen
Right, but sometimes they aren't that hot.
DNG
Film Friendly
Correct me if I am wrong, but no legal proceedings have been opened regarding the copyright? So far it is just armchair discussion by "experts?"
Is there any indication that Illinois would move on its own without a claim by heirs? Won't this likely just stay in limbo forever, until the copyright runs out?
Correct, it is in the discussion stages... and non of "Experts" have the same opinions of the copyright and ownership laws involved according to the link article by Ron.
But keeping it in limbo until the copyright runs out (no CR exists on any of her work with LOC).. can mean that her work stays unpublished for decades!
Are we glad that Vivian did not burn her negatives !!!
Share: