OT: N.Y. camera ban brings on shudder

bmattock

Veteran
Local time
9:14 PM
Joined
Jul 29, 2003
Messages
10,654
Location
Detroit Area
To be honest, I can't say that I think theatergoers have the right to take photos at a private performance - but it seems that surrendering one's camera is a tad Draconian. Is the theater then responsible if something happens to the camera?

Anyway, a warning to those who might otherwise have a camera on their person while taking in a Broadway show. Just an FYI.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks

http://www.calendarlive.com/stage/cl-ca-artsnotes16.1apr16,0,4777181.story?coll=cl-stage-features

N.Y. camera ban brings on shudder
By Scott Timberg
Times Staff Writer

April 16, 2006

ONE Los Angeles theater lover managed to take in more than a dozen plays on a recent visit to New York. But this visitor, who would prefer to remain anonymous, got more drama than he bargained for at one performance.

At the Bernard B. Jacobs Theatre to catch a preview of Richard Greenberg's "Three Days of Rain," starring Julia Roberts and opening officially Wednesday, he and other patrons were ordered — rather rudely, he says — to surrender their cameras before going in or to give up their tickets. Despite years of theatergoing, he says, he's rarely experienced treatment so brusque.

"Although announcers often state prior to show time that it is against New York law to record or photograph a performance," the visitor wrote in an angry e-mail, "none of the other current stars on Broadway — Jonathan Pryce, Patti LuPone, Nathan Lane, et al. — require patrons to surrender their belongings. Shouldn't theatergoers be warned of this when they are buying their tickets," since tourists spending a few days in the city are likely to have cameras with them? "My choice was either give up the camera or not see the show."

To make matters worse, he says, "there was a little cardboard box where they were throwing the cameras. I'd just paid $500 for this camera — it seemed very haphazard and last-minute."

The show's spokesman, Bob Fennell, says checking all kinds of cameras has become standard at such events as film screenings and operas, thanks to bootlegged performances and complaints from artists. "And we're a little more watchful at this performance because there were pictures taken at earlier previews," some of which ended up in publications.

"Quite frankly," Fennell says, camera checking "needs to be done more often."

The final disappointment of our Angeleno — who's unconvinced by that explanation — came on his way out of New York as he headed to Newark International Airport and saw police and Homeland Security officers waving through trucks instead of checking them for bombs.

"Yes, New York, we're back to a pre-9/11 mentality," he wrote. "But at least the world is safe for Julia Roberts from seeing an unflattering photo in Us Weekly."
 
Bill, it seems that you and New York aren't doing too well lately. Last year I saw Meat Loaf at the China Club. Everyone had to surrender their cameras. But 12 megapixel cell phones and other small digital devices were fine. Someone next to me filmed the whole show on a video camera the size of a pack of cigarettes. What we need is some sort of disguise kit that will make an M3 look like a Nextel. Maybe Luigi couldcustom build a case?
 
The last few times I've been to live theater here in LA (okay, I'll admit.. it was Sesame Street Live and The Wiggles) I WISH they would have confiscated cameras. Despite very direct requests to not photograph the performance, flashes were going off left and right. Most annoying were the ushers who kept crawing down the rows -- over toes and (politely) banging patrons knees -- to admonish the errant photographers. Now if they will start confiscating cell phones! don't theater-goers know better, or have they forgotten so soon?

p.s. I've never seen the gemstone collection at the A&V (or is it V&A) museum in London because they confiscate all cameras, purses, bags, etc. prior to entering that secured room.
 
Nothing against New York, this is the just the news I'm reporting! And frankly, I agree that people should not be photographing or videoing private performances if the management does not permit it - the drum I bang on is the right to photograph in public, not in private. In situations like this, I'm all for the rights of the property owners and the theater troupe to control the circumstances under which they are photographed or not. If they step out on the sidewalk for a smoke...that's a different situation.

Just reporting, not complaining!

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
I have been told that they require patrons to check cameras at the Celine Dion show at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas. I know many Las Vegas shows have admonitions to the effect that taking photos is a no-no, but that's the first time I've heard that they required them to be checked. Apparenly they used a metal detector to enforce this. (Yeah, yeah, I know ...)
 
I guess it's all necessary to protect from bootlegging. It's a private deal, so they can set whatever rules they want to. A short time ago, I was working at Giants Stadium, and had to assist a NJ State Trooper who had told a patron for the second time that he had to leave and take his video camera back to his car. ( it was a concert event) He had left the first time, and came right back with it hanging from his neck. The stadium runs a constant recording thru the outside speakers about what's not allowed inside, and this guy was even standing right in front of a 4' by 6' sign also spelling these rules out, while heatedly arguing with the trooper. He then began pushing him and gesturing wildly while screaming, and got arrested. I just don't know what he was thinking.

I also just received a couple of notices of upcoming annual meetings of some stocks that I own, and in the letters came all sorts of do's and dont's... pre-registering by mail, allowing extra time for the security checks the day of the meeting, and being told don't bring cameras, voice or video recorders, and leave the cell phone at home or in the car. So, at least someone is recognizing that cell phones do have pretty good still and even video capabilities.
 
Back
Top Bottom