retow
Well-known
I'll be on a flight to Zurich tonight and visit Switzerland, Germany and Austria. Once back I'll report how these three Euroepan economies are really doing (from experience rather than statistics)
LOL 😛
LOL 😛
retow said:I'll be on a flight to Zurich tonight and visit Switzerland, Germany and Austria. Once back I'll report how these three Euroepan economies are really doing (from experience rather than statistics)
LOL 😛
The ones who lose their homes because of foolishness will be reduced to, well, smaller homes. Nobody is going to be warming their hands around a barrel or selling apples.
Olsen said:Despite the economical growth statistics show that we are not neccessarily more happy. The suicide rate is high in scandinavia,- at least I think so. So is drug and alcohol abuse and we chew anti depresion drugs like chewing gum.
Europe could well be an alternative place to live for young americans who are fed up with 'the dreary statism' of salaries and ordinary people's wealth development and the heavy burden of having to pay, through taxes, the interest on a huge Federal debt,- paying for somebody elses party, - or war.
kevin m said:Indeed. Idealism is a wonderful thing in the abstract, but it doesn't hurt to be pragmatic, either. My wife is evidently eligible for an Irish passport and she's going to get it. Just in case.
She's doing a smart thing. While Ireland was among the poorest nations in Europe a generation back it is now among the best earners.
navilluspm said:Nick,
I like a lot you have to say about cameras, but blaming the Bush adminitration for this? Come on! First of, I am not a Bush backer nor am I a Republican supporter (I love the idea of Universal health care too much). But to blame this on Bush is like saying the reason we have strange world weather is his fault, or he's the reason we have stupid daylight savings time. He's a bad president, not the "anti-christ". I think it is time to point the finger squarely at the problem of American debt: the average American.
We are led to believe, day in and day out, that we deserve a higher quality of life than other countries, that we need luxuries, that our value is found in how much we own. And we Americans buy into it! We want to make more money and quick money: hence the housing bubble. I rode it. I bought a house for 105k and sold it two years later for 145k. The current house I bought is in the innercity (for $60K), and I am content with it.
But most of the time we Americans are not content. We need to buy, and buying is what fuels the economy, so we are incouraged to buy. Why do you think Citi Cards slogan is "live richly"? Why do you think Visa, after tallying the cost of everything in a commerical says the experience was priceless?
We are to blame, and unless we individual Americans learn to live within our means and take financial responsibility, we will fall like the Roman Empire.
I have $5k of creditcard debt I am trying to pull myself out of (my household income is $36K a year, so $5k is a lot.). But what I find staggering is that this huge credit card debt is actually far less than the average American holds: over $12k is the average! This is a lot of money, and that does not include car payments (thankfully mine are all paid off) and house payments!
Bush is not the problem and neither was Clinton (for all the pro-Bush people who might want to blame Clinton). WE are the problem. And WE are also the solution to the problem, if we choose to follow that path instead of blaming our leaders for our personal debts.
RObert Budding said:Revisionist history? Remember the massive tax cuts that Bush sailed through the Republican congress (yes, both houses were controlled by Republicans). Add in a couple of Middle East wars and Prescrition Drug coverage for seniors and you end up with the largest expansion of government since LBJ!
Oh, well, if I die with more debt than I was born with, then I'm better off. The future looks very bright indeed!
Olsen said:The problems that the US society is facing is far beond 'who's gonna be president'.
Bush or Clinton? Well, in Europe we prefer womanizers to dried up alcoholics, but that is not important. The important thing is that the US democratic system is ripe for a reform. A major reform of the sort we have seen in former Sovjet Union (but a better reform indeed). You need a democratic system that represents the people.
Among yourself, you americans, you find some of the best system critics 'in the world'. Pulnitzer Price winners, scientists and economists. You have some of the best (and the worst) press in the world. You have organised yourself in all these very nice sivil organisations prompting everything from sivil rights to environmental issues.
jarski said:hi.
past weeks and especially days there has been alarming news about home loan market problems in US. Asian and European banks injecting billions into monetary system, as if they are fighting against something. Dollar vs Euro value as been steadily declining, like many have noticed from cameras priced in Dollars. whats going on ?
I dont have loans myself, just a little stock options that have been declining - just as they did little over a year ago. then I paniced a bit, withrew from risky ones (with loss). now I'm wondering should I repeat the same mistake again, or fleet the sinking boat and put my money into Leica's 😛
just to correct you on that last point: in the case of Germany at least, the largest problem we face still is indeed that the transformation of East Germany is still going on and has in many ways gone terribly wrong economically. East Germany had a powerful industry that was in effect killed off within five years as a result of a rushed reunification, especially the monetary union which made East German products incompetitively expensive in their former markets. However in spite of reunification being rushed and having gone quite wrong in some ways, having succeeded as far as we have indeed says something about the German economy. At present we have a lot of Korean political scientists visiting Germany to study possible alternative models of reunification, and the consensus seems to be that a rushed reunification of the German type is really infeasible for all but the most powerful economies.Olsen said:Germany is 'the world's largest exporter' and has a huge trade surplus. No small feat. Unemployment is high. Much due to 'die neues bundersländer; former East Germany. It has been an momentous task to transform former East Germany from raqs to riches. - As if USA should incorporate Mexico as one of it's states, with a wide social wellfare program and all. It tells about how strong German economy is. [...] The largest problem all these three nations are facing are all the imigrants that wants to live and work there,..
ruben said:"AP
Dow Industrials Plunge 300 Points
Thursday August 16, 1:07 pm ET "
According to the analysts this is the best time to buy stocks.
Cheers,
Ruben
PS
Do better, buy a Kiev. Who was the RFF folk touring Samoa ?
Thanks, Philipp,rxmd said:Hi,
just to correct you on that last point: in the case of Germany at least, the largest problem we face still is indeed that the transformation of East Germany is still going on and has in many ways gone terribly wrong economically. East Germany had a powerful industry that was in effect killed off within five years as a result of a rushed reunification, especially the monetary union which made East German products incompetitively expensive in their former markets. However in spite of reunification being rushed and having gone quite wrong in some ways, having succeeded as far as we have indeed says something about the German economy. At present we have a lot of Korean political scientists visiting Germany to study possible alternative models of reunification, and the consensus seems to be that a rushed reunification of the German type is really infeasible for all but the most powerful economies.
We don't really have that many new immigrants now, as compared to ten years ago; while there still is a steady influx, it is actually much more controlled, especially regarding immigration from Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. The problem here was rather the practice that anyone who could claim German ancestry would get a German passport and would be instantly eligible for the German social system, meaning that by doing nothing many people earn more than they ever did before by working hard. Yesterday when I had my hair cut here in Tashkent I met an émigré lady who now lives in Germany with her son, receives 1200 EUR a month in state financial aid, does no work at all and spends six months a year back in Tashkent spending those 1200 EUR. This is the result of the combination of a very conservative ancestry-based law on citizenship and the traditional lack of a coherent state policy on immigration in a country which didn't perceive itself as an immigration target at all.
Philipp
Apparently that;s what did for a lot of people in the Wall Street crash. They took advantage of the initial falling prices to buy.Al Patterson said:While I generally agree that the time to buy is when others want out, I personally don't wish to try to catch a falling knife.
Al Patterson said:While I generally agree that the time to buy is when others want out, I personally don't wish to try to catch a falling knife.