Roel
Well-known
Some of my first pics with the G1 and the newly arrived China adapter.
Lighting was low so some motion from the kids is detectable.
Fun camera! Kit lens is nice too.
First two pics from the VC 40mm/1.4 at 1.4/2.0.
Third of the 24/2.8 asph wide open. (Must practice my digital B/W conversions!)
Any comments appreciated.
Regards,
Roel
Lighting was low so some motion from the kids is detectable.
Fun camera! Kit lens is nice too.
First two pics from the VC 40mm/1.4 at 1.4/2.0.
Third of the 24/2.8 asph wide open. (Must practice my digital B/W conversions!)
Any comments appreciated.
Regards,
Roel
Attachments
Last edited:
Avotius
Some guy
Looks like the Chinese adapter is doing ok for these close up images. I hear there are some problems with it at infinity but I have not tried mine out yet. The last shot seems pretty nice for black and white with a digital camera, sure there is always room for improvement but not too bad says I.
I got to get my hands on this camera sooner rather then later, its killing me that it is so expensive here and I got the big rent bill coming up....
I got to get my hands on this camera sooner rather then later, its killing me that it is so expensive here and I got the big rent bill coming up....
Burkey
Well-known
Very nice. Thanks for posting these shots. The 40/1.4 will be one of the lenses I'll be using on the G1 once I get it. It's nice to see examples from the Nokton and the G1 together.
. . . Burkey
. . . Burkey
pbhome
Member
Roel,
Was there any PP done on these pic (besides from the third one being B&W)?
-PB
Was there any PP done on these pic (besides from the third one being B&W)?
-PB
Roel
Well-known
PB,
I used the Jpegs (not raw) Just did a little bit in Iphoto. I think a little bit colortemperature and a little bit lighter. No sharpening.
Roel
I used the Jpegs (not raw) Just did a little bit in Iphoto. I think a little bit colortemperature and a little bit lighter. No sharpening.
Roel
pbhome
Member
Roel,
These are very nice, BTW.
Thank you for sharing.
-PB
These are very nice, BTW.
Thank you for sharing.
-PB
dazedgonebye
Veteran
Try some wide open.
Using the 40/f1.4 as a portrait lens seems a very interesting possibility.
Using the 40/f1.4 as a portrait lens seems a very interesting possibility.
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
Nice!
I've got the 40/1.4 sc on my G1 now. I took a bunch of mirror selfies last night (because no one would sit for me) using all of my lenses (and no I won't post them!). Where possible, all were shot at 1/80 @ f2.8. With some lenses it was difficult to get the sharpest image, but on the whole the 35, 40, and 50 focal lengths were very easy to focus, and the 40/1.4 was consistently very very nice.
/
I've got the 40/1.4 sc on my G1 now. I took a bunch of mirror selfies last night (because no one would sit for me) using all of my lenses (and no I won't post them!). Where possible, all were shot at 1/80 @ f2.8. With some lenses it was difficult to get the sharpest image, but on the whole the 35, 40, and 50 focal lengths were very easy to focus, and the 40/1.4 was consistently very very nice.
/
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
Cmon Ray!
Let's see em.

Let's see em.
Last edited:
pbhome
Member
SC v.s. Normal multi-coated
SC v.s. Normal multi-coated
Ray,
"SC" is for single-coated, correct?
Do you know the different (in look) between SC and normal multi-coated?
TIA
-PB
SC v.s. Normal multi-coated
Nice!
I've got the 40/1.4 sc on my G1 now. ... and the 40/1.4 was consistently very very nice.
/
Ray,
"SC" is for single-coated, correct?
Do you know the different (in look) between SC and normal multi-coated?
TIA
-PB
back alley
IMAGES
Ray,
"SC" is for single-coated, correct?
Do you know the different (in look) between SC and normal multi-coated?
TIA
-PB
to my eye the difference is minute!
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
to my eye the difference is minute!
I feel like in the long list of variables that will affect your final picture the SC vs MC is something that is very small and you can compensate your photographs in other more effective ways.
back alley
IMAGES
what he said...
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
Cmon Ray!
Let's see em.
![]()
no f*ing way!
/
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
I feel like in the long list of variables that will affect your final picture the SC vs MC is something that is very small and you can compensate your photographs in other more effective ways.
I agree. Don't know if the MC provides better flare protection (?). The rumor is that the SC provides a better b&w image, but I'm not sure I could tell.
/
Roel
Well-known
I don't have the MC so I can't compare but the above pics have been taken with an SC. Had no flare problems yet.
Roel
Roel
lubitel
Well-known
wait a minute, you have an adapter to put m lenses on this G-1???
pbhome
Member
For Panasonic G1 - micro 4/3? Yes, there are 3-4 companies offer this type of adaptor.
- Rayqual
- Novoflex
- CameraQuest
- jinfinance
Here's one of a discussion of the last 2 adaptors.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=69944
- Rayqual
- Novoflex
- CameraQuest
- jinfinance
Here's one of a discussion of the last 2 adaptors.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=69944
lubitel
Well-known
For Panasonic G1 - micro 4/3? Yes, there are 3-4 companies offer this type of adaptor.
- Rayqual
- Novoflex
- CameraQuest
- jinfinance
Here's one of a discussion of the last 2 adaptors.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=69944
well, that's amazing!! a poor man's leica M8!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.