rpsawin said:This reminds me of another incident that occured shortly after 9/11. A photographer in Denver was shooting some architectural shots of an historic hotel. He was suddenly swarmed by secret service agaents who wrestled him to the ground, seized all his equipment and then held/questioned him for several hours. As it turned out "Dick" Chenney was staying in the hotel (remember the top officials rotated around the country for awhile) and the photographer was accused of violating national security. His equipment was vouchered but a year later had not been returned. I have not seen an update for some time but it is ridiculous that the incident occured in the first place.! I could see the s.s. (yeah, we have an s.s. too) demanding the film and sending the guy on his way, but past that is an attack on the man's civil liberties.
Bob
Yeah, lots of important stuff there. Last night I learned that a teenie-bopper in Hollywood got stoned and that bottled water comes from a faucet. Talk about your shock-n'-awe... real cutting edge stuff. And the real scoop... "Does NASA Have a Drinkng Problem?" I'm tellin' ya boys, I was on the edge of my seat.If you have been watching the news...
sepiareverb said:We should all read the Photographers Right and have the basic rules in our heads. There is NO WAY I'd have film pulled from my camera by a cop or security officer. Intimidation by our governments can't be allowed in any form- that's a slippery slope.
http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm
colyn said:There were a lot of unsubstantiated rumors like this after 9/11.
Do you have a news report or other reference to the actual event?
colyn said:If the truth be known most of the problems photographers have are from rent-a-cops. Most real police know the law regarding photographers rights.