guardado1213
Established
This thread makes me feel better as I don't feel like I'm the only one using a RZ670 shooting street. I too found the idea of being 'totally conspicuous' more suitable than trying to 'disappear'. I decided to exploit the ugliness of big *** cameras, and I love it. I just hope I don't go buying a 4x5 or 8x10.
Yeah I don't think you can disappear behind a 4x5
minnichphoto
Established
I shot street on a 4x5 for many years with a Toyo 45A. Here: http://minnichphoto.tumblr.com/tagged/4x5
I eventually became frustrated with trying to take boxed film through TSA, so I switched to smaller formats, mainly hasselblad.
I eventually became frustrated with trying to take boxed film through TSA, so I switched to smaller formats, mainly hasselblad.
blue4130
Well-known
Yes, These were scanned on an epson v750 with the standard holders.Vance, Flatbed scans?
x-ray
Veteran
I shot street on a 4x5 for many years with a Toyo 45A. Here: http://minnichphoto.tumblr.com/tagged/4x5
I eventually became frustrated with trying to take boxed film through TSA, so I switched to smaller formats, mainly hasselblad.
Very impressive work!
giganova
Well-known
Street photography is a numbers game. The more pictures you shoot, the more likely it is that you will have a good one. So you have to factor in how many pictures you can shoot per roll before you need to change film and miss shots, how fast you can change film. Plus, you have to react quickly when something interesting happens spontaneous (no hyper focus on Medium Format).
All these arguments are against medium format for street photography -- but as may have pointed out here, there's a lot of excellent street photography done with MF in the past (think Vivian Maier).
All these arguments are against medium format for street photography -- but as may have pointed out here, there's a lot of excellent street photography done with MF in the past (think Vivian Maier).
Share: