Colin G.
Established
Something metal is preferable. What’s a good choice? What are others using?
Something metal is preferable. What’s a good choice? What are others using?
Why not use the nifty dome-shaped hood for the modern Pentax DA 40mm f/2.8 lens, which also has a 49mm filter thread?
How about buying a couple of those effect filters that often show up on flea markets, knocking out the glass and stacking as many of the rings as you can without vignetting?
How about buying a couple of those effect filters that often show up on flea markets, knocking out the glass and stacking as many of the rings as you can without vignetting?
How about buying a couple of those effect filters that often show up on flea markets, knocking out the glass and stacking as many of the rings as you can without vignetting?
And how do you like the lens? thinking about one of those myself, having finally acquired a nice MX...
That would only work if you're using the 40mm on APS-C digital. On a 35mm/fullframe camera, that hood will cause vignetting (I'm pretty sure).
That is what I do with my zuiko 40mm. Two skylight filters together but I broke the glass. Works well.
I do this trick with various lenses, especially wide-angles. It works well.
The 40mm is a 5 elements in 4 groups design, like a Tessar with one extra elements at rear.
It has relatively low rating on the wonderful and informative pentaxforum. Because other pentax lenses are too good. I guess.
However, when compared with those 40/38mm f/2.8 Tessar-like lenses they put on those Japanese compact rangefinders, the Pentax 40mm just blow all of them out of water. It is sharper and you wouldn't notice the nasty vignetting, which is a "feature" from those 40/38mm Tessar wide angles.
I like the lens, it is sharp enough and the extra compactness it provides make my MX compete with my rangefinders.
![]()
f/2.8 or so. Kodak Gold 200.
Would a screw-on 50mm hood vignette if used in conjunction with a filter? Would it be better to use one for 35mm focal length?
The lens had a dedicated hood according to this site: http://kmp.pentaxians.eu/lenses/normal/m40f2-8/
nice photo by the way, l have used the Pentax 40 2.8 for many years and for me its a great pocket combo when teamed up with an MX or LX🙂
Thanks! I really wish the MX can be a quieter camera, to fit its small form factor. Then I probably will use it more than any rangefinders.
Actually the shutter and the mirror make only a small noise on my MX, it's always the aperture-pushing-lever's returning makes the biggest and penetrating "Ka-ting".