Permissible Question Part 3

All of the photos below, while not the greatest shots ever (Im a mediocre at best street photographer) were made with a 5D and the humongous 50mm L lens. I dont think one person noticed I took the shot, either.


Untitled by andre dos santos, on Flickr


Untitled by andre dos santos, on Flickr


Untitled by andre dos santos, on Flickr


Untitled by andre dos santos, on Flickr


Untitled by andre dos santos, on Flickr

Well, if you shoot inside subway with a DSLR, than I say you're hungry and driven. Keep it up and great images.
 
All of the photos below, while not the greatest shots ever (Im a mediocre at best street photographer) were made with a 5D and the humongous 50mm L lens. I dont think one person noticed I took the shot, either.


Untitled by andre dos santos, on Flickr


Untitled by andre dos santos, on Flickr


Untitled by andre dos santos, on Flickr


Untitled by andre dos santos, on Flickr


Untitled by andre dos santos, on Flickr

Seems logical to me that nobody noticed: most pictures (I'm not sure about the second one) seem to be taken with the camera at belly height, and in a subway, there's plenty of noise to hide the shutter sound (at least, in Brussels there is :).

Stefan.
 
I think it's because the MF Digital solutions are mostly just extensions to existing body designs, even of the off brand versions.

When you look at more expensive full frame DSLRs you have a great package compared to say a Nikon F3 with Motor, but you can not remove the motor on the D3, so it always looks bigger. When you place it next to an OM, even with a motor not a lot even comes close. I still love the D40X/60 for the size, too bad the viewfinder is not as good as more expensive Nikons.

I think that the MFs miss any negative because with their digital backs they are not that much bigger than their film cousins. High-End DSLRs, small is not a work that you would use in the same sentence, unless you were talking about available cash after the purchase......

B2 (;->
 
Back
Top Bottom