Photo ethics

newspaperguy

Well-known
Local time
10:49 AM
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
1,524
Location
Southern Maryland US of A
Ethics Test Question 🙂

This test only has one question, but it's a very
important one. By giving an honest answer, you will
discover where you stand morally. The test features
an unlikely, completely fictional situation in which
you will have to make a decision. Remember that your
answer needs to be honest, yet spontaneous. Please
scroll down slowly and give due consideration to
each line.

You are in Florida, Miami to be specific.

There is chaos all around you, caused by a
hurricane, with severe flooding.

This is a flood of biblical proportions.

You are a photojournalist working for a major
newspaper, and you're caught in the middle of this
epic disaster. The situation is nearly hopeless.

You're trying to shoot career-making photos.

There are houses and people swirling around you,
some disappearing under the water. Nature is
unleashing all of its destructive fury.

Suddenly you see a woman in the water. She is
fighting for her life, trying not to be taken down
with the debris. You move closer. . Somehow the
woman looks familiar. You suddenly realize who it
is. It's Hillary Clinton!

At the same time you notice that the raging waters
are about to take her under . . . forever.

You have two options--you can save the life of
Hillary Clinton, or you can shoot a dramatic
Pulitzer Prize winning photo, documenting the death
of one of the world's most powerful women.

So here's the question, and please give an honest
answer:









Would you select high contrast color film, or would
you go with the classic simplicity of black and
white?
 
Hey, that's an old one, only that originally it had Georg W. in place of Hillary... (made more sense that way...)

Roman
 
jan normandale said:
Rick,

Doesn't Roman's observation on the source of the question , raise a question of 'plagiarism' in this ethics problem ? Just asking? ;-)

Jan

Deep thought, I like it.
 
I'd save her, any woman that can live with Bill after his shenanigans deserves another chance. Now if it was Bill or Al Gore, hmhhhh...
 
I don't buy her martyrdom act for a second.. she latched onto Bill back in their Yale days only because she knew he was capable of getting her farther down the political road than she was capable by herself

and notice how she is now yelling for an independent counsel to investigate a natural disaster.. she wasn't very fond of independent counsels during the Rose Law firm filegate scandal.. or the Whitewater scandal.. or the Travelgate scandal.. or Monicagate.. or Sandy Berger's sock-stuffing felony

fortunately, I believe her political career has gone as far as it will go
 
Oh that Hillary Clinton
the one that said terrorists came from Canada but never retracted that one..... well then BW or colour was the question.

Save her, it's the right thing to do, then shoot her with a digital SLR, 'I ain't shootin no politician with real film' not worthy... joke
 
Back
Top Bottom