Exdsc
Well-known
I like photographs that don't try to tell a story.
I'm not interested in stories, I'm interested in how a photograph looks as a whole. The 'look' is everything... If I was interested in stories and pictures, I'd read comic books.
Photography is not a substitute for writing.
I'm not interested in stories, I'm interested in how a photograph looks as a whole. The 'look' is everything... If I was interested in stories and pictures, I'd read comic books.
Photography is not a substitute for writing.
airfrogusmc
Veteran
I like photographs that don't try to tell a story.
I'm not interested in stories, I'm interested in how a photograph looks as a whole. The 'look' is everything... If I was interested in stories and pictures, I'd read comic books.
Photography is not a substitute for writing.
Certainly the way I feel about.
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
I like photographs that don't try to tell a story.
I'm not interested in stories, I'm interested in how a photograph looks as a whole. The 'look' is everything... If I was interested in stories and pictures, I'd read comic books.
Photography is not a substitute for writing.
Yes, I'm interested in a photograph's photography. Illustrated stories are fine. But having one discipline needing validation from another is silly.
It's a bit like saying "a good photograph needs colors". Yes, there are great and excellent color photographs, but there are also great and excellent monochrome photographs. Somebody insisting that a photograph needs to be monochrome is simply silly. Same thing for so-called storytelling requirements.
Share: