B.Toews
Well-known
Thank you, Bill!
Leica M3, Color-Skopar 50mm f/2.5, Bergger Pancro 400.
Erik.
![]()
Really enjoyed this one Erik!
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Thank you Brendan, ha ha, yes, that is a funny one.
Leica M3, Color-Skopar 50mm f/2.5, Bergger Pancro 400.
Leica M3, Color-Skopar 50mm f/2.5, Bergger Pancro 400.


clachnacuddin
Established
I just bought a couple of rolls of Bergger, looking forward to trying them out even more after seeing this!
Hogarth Ferguson
Well-known

Gf670w + Pancro 400 (obviously)

Gf670w + Pancro 400 at 1600
Kenj8246
Well-known
^ I don't see a lot of grain here. The last shot @ 1600 is very nice.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
^ I don't see a lot of grain here. The last shot @ 1600 is very nice.
Indeed, but this is a 120 spool, 6x6 or 6x7. However, in the dark background I see a lot of grain!
Erik.
Hogarth Ferguson
Well-known
I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how to scan shadows as black or very dark. I always get this digital noise from the scans.Indeed, but this is a 120 spool, 6x6 or 6x7. However, in the dark background I see a lot of grain!
Erik.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how to scan shadows as black or very dark. I always get this digital noise from the scans.
I think that the histogram of your negative is not set to the scanner. Your highlights are too white and the shadows are too gray. I do not know if your scanner offers this possibility. When it does, you have to set your darkest part (search for it with the densitometer) to 1 (just 1 step below 2) and your lightest part lower than 255. These are the numbers used on Epson scanners. Then your scanner is "set" for the histogram of your negative and you will get a scan on wich the darkest part is absolutely black.
Erik.
Hogarth Ferguson
Well-known
I have tried that a few times and then given up. I will give it another go. Thank you very much, Erik.
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
I bought several rolls in 35mm format and look forward to using them.
Erik's Perceptol results are great; I'd really like to see some using HCC110 etc.
BTW Erik what hardware/software did you use for scanning these photos?
Chris
Erik's Perceptol results are great; I'd really like to see some using HCC110 etc.
BTW Erik what hardware/software did you use for scanning these photos?
Chris
Deklari
Well-known
I think that the histogram of your negative is not set to the scanner. Your highlights are too white and the shadows are too gray. I do not know if your scanner offers this possibility. When it does, you have to set your darkest part (search for it with the densitometer) to 1 (just 1 step below 2) and your lightest part lower than 255. These are the numbers used on Epson scanners. Then your scanner is "set" for the histogram of your negative and you will get a scan on wich the darkest part is absolutely black.
Erik.
I think it is also depends from film exposure. If negative under/over exposed the scanner give high contrast range. You negative Erik always perfectly exposed and developed correctly
Erik van Straten
Veteran
BTW Erik what hardware/software did you use for scanning these photos?
I only used my trusted Epson V600, its software and my very old Photoshop Elements 2.
Erik.
Kenj8246
Well-known
Bergger Pan 400 in 4X5, D76 ~13:30 min @ 73F.

Film test, Aggie landmarks by Kenny Johnson, on Flickr

Film test, Aggie landmarks by Kenny Johnson, on Flickr

Film test, Aggie landmarks by Kenny Johnson, on Flickr

Film test, Aggie landmarks by Kenny Johnson, on Flickr
x-ray
Veteran
No two negatives are alike and each should be treated as unique. There's no specific formula that applies to all negatives.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Leica M3, Color-Skopar 50mm f/2.5, Bergger Pancro 400.
Erik.
Erik.

jmilkins
Digited User

Gf670w + Pancro 400 at 1600[/QUOTE]
A bit OT, but thanks for this image Hogarth. Peter Norman is my uncle, and I've never seen this statue from this angle. http://https://theconversation.com/i-will-stand-with-you-finally-an-apology-to-peter-norman-10107
That GF670W is on my wish list - I love my Bessa III.
Hogarth Ferguson
Well-known
A bit OT, but thanks for this image Hogarth. Peter Norman is my uncle, and I've never seen this statue from this angle. http://https://theconversation.com/i-will-stand-with-you-finally-an-apology-to-peter-norman-10107
That GF670W is on my wish list - I love my Bessa III.
The image that this statue is made from is one of my favorite images, it is so powerful. I'm aware of what it cost them, all of them, including your uncle.
As for the camera, I have both iterations of it, the folder and the wide, and I love them both. The wide was purchased 3 years after and slowly took over as my main shooter. Just an awesome camera.
jmilkins
Digited User
Indeed, Hogarth. Brave men of principle.
Looking forward to more images from this interesting film from the talented photographers that have posted.
Looking forward to more images from this interesting film from the talented photographers that have posted.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Leica M3, Color-Skopar 50mm f/2.5, Bergger Pancro 400, Perceptol.
Erik.
Erik.




KEH
Well-known
Anyone try this film in D76 yet?
Loaded my first roll in a tertiary camera.
My lab uses Clayton F76, which is pretty much D76 in a different bottle, as far as I know. However, I tend to like denser photos, so the result after a bit of Lightroom has darker shadows and more contrast than what Erik is producing.
Kirk
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.