Gumby
Veteran
I was (naively) hoping there is something like the Retina that offers great quality for little money.
The only thing about this statement that is potentially naive is when it comes to using the Retina 35 or 85mm lenses. With Retina's Schneider 50mm I would defy anyone to reliably tell the differenence between an image taken with a L-camera and a Retina.
Perhaps we could talk Raid into doing a statistical valid study???
AgentX
Well-known
You can't close a Retina II/IIIc with the wide-angle attachment on, right? IIRC--I had one briefly and liked it a lot, but that was a real pain.
What about a used Bessa T with a CV-35 lens and a mini 35/28 viewfinder?
Or a used Leica CL with the 40mm?
What about a used Bessa T with a CV-35 lens and a mini 35/28 viewfinder?
Or a used Leica CL with the 40mm?
Last edited:
Gumby
Veteran
You can't close a Retina II/IIIc with the wide-angle attachment on, right?
I think you are correct. The f/4 attachments, both 35 and 80mm, are HUGE in both depth and diameter -- 60mm diameter and equally deep I'd say. The f/5.6 is deeper/thicker than the 50 but doesn't require an ox cart to carry like the others do... but I seem to recall that it still won't close.
All are a pain because of the different focus scales... but if one does range focus and aren't too particular it should work OK.
feenej
Well-known
Olympus 35 SP.
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
Guys, please don't mention the L-word. I am having a very hard time as it is not buying a beatiful m-system camera. I would love to own a Leica or Bessa and all I need is two lenses, 50mm and 35mm but this would cost me at least 1500 bucks.At the moment I am trying to be sensible before the Leica bug costs me a lot of money.
Nonsense, if you really want a good taste of the M-system, go with a used M4-P and Ultron 35/1.7. I got this very combination for less than half the price you quoted up there with a little patience.
But then again, how do you know that you'll not like a Zorki 1 with Jupiter 12 if you don't try it?
bgb
Well-known
Ok then here's my short list ... Yashica Electro! That was easy huh?
Use it while you save up for a Leica
You know you want one! Resistance IS futile 
I think you should take a road trip to visit Roger, not only will you get to meet the great man himself but you get to play with a real Leica
Use it while you save up for a Leica
I think you should take a road trip to visit Roger, not only will you get to meet the great man himself but you get to play with a real Leica
AgentX
Well-known
No reason not to get a Bessa instead of a Leica if the image is what you're after. Although a new Bessa and a used Leica can be comparable in price, although you do get a much saner film-loading procedure with the Bessa.
ludoo
Established
I was (naively) hoping there is something like the Retina that offers great quality for little money.
The "poor man's Leica", i.e. the Agfa Ambi Silette maybe? I saw one go the other day for about 20 euros. And you won't need an external VF when using the 35mm. The downside is the 35mm is only f4.
btgc
Veteran
I have only cheap FL RF's. Today out of curiosity I checked email from ebay with recommendations for me - and list goes on as:
Leica M3 Rangefinder Camera Avg. Price: $756.37
Canonet QL17 Film Camera Avg. Price: $67.08
Olympus XA A11 35mm Rangefinder Camera Avg. Price: $75.51
Mind you, I haven't searched for any of this. Probably they just know how it ends
Leica M3 Rangefinder Camera Avg. Price: $756.37
Canonet QL17 Film Camera Avg. Price: $67.08
Olympus XA A11 35mm Rangefinder Camera Avg. Price: $75.51
Mind you, I haven't searched for any of this. Probably they just know how it ends
Dunk
Established
There's a bargain Canonet rangefinder camera listed here http://www.dagcamera.com/otheritems.htm
Cheers
dunk
Cheers
dunk
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.