Yuphorix
Member
Hi all,
I'm quite a newbie to film photography and I've recently setup a workflow that consists of developing BW negatives myself (Arista Premium 400 in Ilfosol 3) and scanning them using a Plustek 7500i & Silverfast SE.
In the beginning, I found that my scans were coming out quite overexposed. I eventually found out that by reducing the Gamma Gradiation from the value of 2 to 1.4-1.5 was I able to get scans at the right range of colors.
What I find odd is after googling about Gamma Gradiation, it seems that the standard range seems to be from 1.8-2.2. Obviously, my 1.5 is somewhat decently outside of that range. I also dug up some C-41 negatives and scanned them as well and found that the value of 1.5 gave the best results (whereas 2 would overexpose the scan).
I guess my question is do you guys have any idea what is going on, and if this should be a cause for concern? Thanks!
I'm quite a newbie to film photography and I've recently setup a workflow that consists of developing BW negatives myself (Arista Premium 400 in Ilfosol 3) and scanning them using a Plustek 7500i & Silverfast SE.
In the beginning, I found that my scans were coming out quite overexposed. I eventually found out that by reducing the Gamma Gradiation from the value of 2 to 1.4-1.5 was I able to get scans at the right range of colors.
What I find odd is after googling about Gamma Gradiation, it seems that the standard range seems to be from 1.8-2.2. Obviously, my 1.5 is somewhat decently outside of that range. I also dug up some C-41 negatives and scanned them as well and found that the value of 1.5 gave the best results (whereas 2 would overexpose the scan).
I guess my question is do you guys have any idea what is going on, and if this should be a cause for concern? Thanks!