squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
I took this picture on a trip to Denver a few weeks ago, and knew as I was taking it that it was pre-ruined by something in the frame. As an exercise, I decided to see if I could persuasively remove the offending object, so I went at it with Pixelmator for twenty minutes or so. I'm just curious how obvious the edit is, and how long it takes you to find the spot. It's obvious to me, but I already know the answer!
FWIW, I did put a note on flickr that the photo was edited. Not trying to pass it off as untouched.
Don't scroll down if you want to guess!
Denver street (5 of 9) edit by J. Robert Lennon, on Flickr
FWIW, I did put a note on flickr that the photo was edited. Not trying to pass it off as untouched.
Don't scroll down if you want to guess!
Denver street (5 of 9) edit by J. Robert Lennon, on Flickrwafflecakee
Well-known
Something on the left side of the doors?
Otherwise I'm not seeing it!
Otherwise I'm not seeing it!
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
Actually, no! I'll post the original in a bit...
daveleo
what?
Filzkoeter
stray animal
No chance, I'm not seeing it (and I'm quite good at picture manipulation). I didn't find any real clues screaming "this was edited!" 
(I even downloaded the big size and manipulated the levels too see if something that's off would show)
(I even downloaded the big size and manipulated the levels too see if something that's off would show)Dayrell bishop
Well-known
The writing on the wall.
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
I didn't change anything at middle bottom...here's the original! Quite surprised it isn't more obvious.
Denver street (5 of 9) by J. Robert Lennon, on Flickr
I actually see that I kind of screwed up the overhang on the doors, but it still looks ok...
Denver street (5 of 9) by J. Robert Lennon, on FlickrI actually see that I kind of screwed up the overhang on the doors, but it still looks ok...
Dayrell bishop
Well-known
Very well done
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
ahh, thank you, another lie in the service of Art
Filzkoeter
stray animal
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
Sweeeeet, well done! Now I can indeed spot some clues... but they are minor and easy to correct
aha, that is better!
JoeV
Thin Air, Bright Sun
What have you done?! Do you not know that photographs are supposed to depict reality?
Very well done clone stamping, it does improve the image.
~Joe
Very well done clone stamping, it does improve the image.
~Joe
dogberryjr
[Pithy phrase]
Nicely done. Also nice to see you back.
rwintle
Scientist by day
Would not have spotted that. I thought I saw a repeating pattern in the bricks of the wall, about halfway between the front grill of the car and the right side of the frame. Seems I was wrong.
Nicely done, and yes, photo greatly improved as a result. A good reminder to the rest of us that sometimes it is better not to be too precious about keeping things "straight out of the camera".
Nicely done, and yes, photo greatly improved as a result. A good reminder to the rest of us that sometimes it is better not to be too precious about keeping things "straight out of the camera".
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
What have you done?! Do you not know that photographs are supposed to depict reality?
LOL
Thank you! It's nice to see you all again.
alfredian
Well-known
And I was going for the gonzo hemi-restoration on the car
And I was going for the gonzo hemi-restoration on the car
I'm so retro-clueless. I was going to opt for the gonzo-diagonal "before-after" restoration job on the Seventies Lead-Sled Classic. Rolling advert for a paint and body shop? No? Thanks for the tech tour, alfredian
And I was going for the gonzo hemi-restoration on the car
I'm so retro-clueless. I was going to opt for the gonzo-diagonal "before-after" restoration job on the Seventies Lead-Sled Classic. Rolling advert for a paint and body shop? No? Thanks for the tech tour, alfredian
robert blu
quiet photographer
I'm surprised!
robert
robert
