mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
OK.
So I'd never owned or used a rangefinder before less than a month ago. I have one now (a very nice Hexar RF, which I love to death). I thought I had GAS under control. I only bought one extra lens (an M-Hexanon 35/2, mint condition). I have it, I use it, so far I think its great.
But now, it seems, I own at least three more rangefinders - a Zorki 4 (with Jupiter 8), a Zorki 6 (with I-50) ... OK, so far, ... but much more seriously a double-stroke, recently CLA'd, M3.
I could live with the FSU attack (BTW, I had no idea what most of these TLAs meant three weeks ago - GAS, FSU, CLA - I'm hooked and I never even saw it coming!).
Now, psychologically, the FSUs are easy: how much fuss can you make over a $25 camera+lens? While I'm very much an electronically-metered aperture-priority kind've guy, I planned to play with cheap cameras, lenses and film and see what happened.
But then the M3 happened. It seemed perfectly logical at the time. I bid the reserve (US$650) for a recently CLA'd double-stroke M3 on the basis that I was checking the market out, I couldn't win, and if I did I was well ahead of the game.
Nice theory. I'd even buy it in practice - except after I bid, my dentist decided to have an annual holiday in Tuscany on the back of my teeth (as it were). And I won the bid, at the reserve (another, almost as nice-looking, M3 I bid on went for more than twice the price: go figure).
Now, I'm still very happy to have the M3 (and it is legit: I've had plenty of good contact with the seller). But the M3 seems a much more serious sort of camera, which I'll have to treat seriously. So, given that (to me) "sunny 16" sounds like a way of ordering eggs, what do I do about metering with my now-serious manual cameras?
Is the CV II (expensive) hot-shoe meter worth its weight in gold (or more)? Should I go with the cheapest hand-held ambient light meter I can find? Should I try to teach myself to be a human light-meter (old dogs, new tricks, and all)???
My beat-up but inquiring mind would like to benefit from your collective offerings...
...Mike
So I'd never owned or used a rangefinder before less than a month ago. I have one now (a very nice Hexar RF, which I love to death). I thought I had GAS under control. I only bought one extra lens (an M-Hexanon 35/2, mint condition). I have it, I use it, so far I think its great.
But now, it seems, I own at least three more rangefinders - a Zorki 4 (with Jupiter 8), a Zorki 6 (with I-50) ... OK, so far, ... but much more seriously a double-stroke, recently CLA'd, M3.
I could live with the FSU attack (BTW, I had no idea what most of these TLAs meant three weeks ago - GAS, FSU, CLA - I'm hooked and I never even saw it coming!).
Now, psychologically, the FSUs are easy: how much fuss can you make over a $25 camera+lens? While I'm very much an electronically-metered aperture-priority kind've guy, I planned to play with cheap cameras, lenses and film and see what happened.
But then the M3 happened. It seemed perfectly logical at the time. I bid the reserve (US$650) for a recently CLA'd double-stroke M3 on the basis that I was checking the market out, I couldn't win, and if I did I was well ahead of the game.
Nice theory. I'd even buy it in practice - except after I bid, my dentist decided to have an annual holiday in Tuscany on the back of my teeth (as it were). And I won the bid, at the reserve (another, almost as nice-looking, M3 I bid on went for more than twice the price: go figure).
Now, I'm still very happy to have the M3 (and it is legit: I've had plenty of good contact with the seller). But the M3 seems a much more serious sort of camera, which I'll have to treat seriously. So, given that (to me) "sunny 16" sounds like a way of ordering eggs, what do I do about metering with my now-serious manual cameras?
Is the CV II (expensive) hot-shoe meter worth its weight in gold (or more)? Should I go with the cheapest hand-held ambient light meter I can find? Should I try to teach myself to be a human light-meter (old dogs, new tricks, and all)???
My beat-up but inquiring mind would like to benefit from your collective offerings...
...Mike
Last edited: