Praise for the Spotmatic

Once you've got a Spotmatic, you don't really need anything else (as a film shooter). All were taken with the 55mm f1.8:

527535_10150947238356150_1824940989_n.jpg


557447_10150947239366150_2004918242_n.jpg


64638_10150554337106150_631443089_n.jpg
 
The SV/H3V feels sooo nice in the hand. The Nikon F and F2 feels like a brick (and I don't mind), but the Pentaxes feel more, Khakis and a button up shirt.

I bid on a SP for kicks and giggles, and won it for $30
The thing looks fresh out of the box, minus some baseplate wear. My dad saw it and went right into nostalgia mode (he was torn between an Exakta and a Spotmatic at the time and chose the former)
 
Good to hear all the Spotmatic love here...

The Spotmatics have a 0.89x magnification and the OM1 a 0.92x magnification. The 55mm lens lends a bit of magnification that is not built into the viewfinder - in effect giving 1:1 viewing.

After much further inspection, I can now notice that the Spotmatic viewfinder is a slight bit smaller. That said, the difference is slight enough that I don't think it matters much.

By this time I've found many older SLRs suffer from some sort of prism or mirror degradation, there can be a lot of difference in brightness, as well as clarity amongst the same model. There are also of course occasionally different screens installed in cameras with "fixed" screens.

As Alfredian said, I think I was lucky to find a seldom-used, well cared for body and lens - as a result everything was super clean and clear. Other Spotmatics may not have fared so well. My OM1 on the other hand seems to have a much blurrier screen outside of the split prism circle - perhaps I need to invest in a replacement.

It's a second-best, slightly rougher SV with a built in meter. I prefer the SV.

Cheers,

R.

Until I chance across one, ignorance will be bliss!
 
Eric, looks like you're getting some great results out of your 55 f1.8!

Also looks like you found some garlic mustard - a really awful invasive species that's ravaging forests across the Midwest and Northeast. On the off chance there isn't much in your area yet, it would be good to pull it out!

Once you've got a Spotmatic, you don't really need anything else (as a film shooter). All were taken with the 55mm f1.8:

527535_10150947238356150_1824940989_n.jpg
 
Also looks like you found some garlic mustard - a really awful invasive species that's ravaging forests across the Midwest and Northeast. On the off chance there isn't much in your area yet, it would be good to pull it out!

Hmmm, it's been a while since I took that shot. I'll keep my eyes peeled. Thanks for the heads-up.
 
Finding a lightly-used Spotmatic isn't too difficult; the Nikon F series displaced them as the hard-core professional's camera.

My working kit during the 1970s was a pair of Spotmatic F bodies, one with a 28/3.5 and the other with an 85/1.8. Always very accurate and reliable.
 
I like the Spotmatics, but the stopped-down is rather a pain, especially with the switch being pushed up to engage it. I'm actually a big fan of the open-aperture metering Spotmatics, like the F, ES and ES II. And the lenses are great, as all agree.
 
I forgot about the 85 1.8. What a great lens!


I had one and much against my better judgement sold it because predictably I wanted to buy something else - some Leica kit, I think. My SMC version was pristine and produced beautiful images. Fortunately I also had a preset version of the 85mm f1.9 which is every bit as good (some say better). I still own the latter and use it on an M4/3 camera body with adapter. Its wonderful.
 
The slightly longer 55mm focal length and the close focus to under half a meter make the 55 f2 Super Takumar I have very useful. The Spotmatic is an industrial design icon. Mine sits around tables at home more than any other camera. It was given to me by a client recently, no-one having any use for it. I can't get a battery for it, but it doesn't matter.
 
Back
Top Bottom