S
StuartR
Guest
It's actually the hobbyists who are the ones more likely to spend the money on it. Most pros will probably not be able to justify it from a business perspective, so they will either not buy it, or buy it as a "personal camera". I'd be interested to hear what kind of return Leica will make on each M8 at 4995, because frankly, I don't think it will be a lot at all. The cost of R&D, combined with very high manufacturing costs (low production run, high labor costs, high quality parts), the need to pay other companies (Kodak and Jenoptik) to do part of the design or for parts, along with the pathetically weak dollar suggest to me that they are selling this as inexpensively as they can. Think about it, it only costs 1700 dollars more than a standard M7. For that money they have to be able to put in a 10 megapixel sensor, completely redesign the shutter and advance assembly, put on a large LCD, come up with a completely different battery and power assembly, redo the viewfinder so that the framelines automatically adjust to the sensor crop, add some sort of lens information gathering system in the mount....and that is just what we know about.
The EOS 1DsMkII costs a lot more than 1700 dollars more than the 1vs, and likewise, the Nikon D series cost more than 1700 dollars more than the F6...
The EOS 1DsMkII costs a lot more than 1700 dollars more than the 1vs, and likewise, the Nikon D series cost more than 1700 dollars more than the F6...
Last edited by a moderator: