Printer recommendation please - epson r3000 or 3880

david.elliott said:
Care to elaborate?
Click to expand...

Epson r1800 and r1900 that clogged heads, were difficult to get a good print out of, built like crap (imo) and just generally found the design and function to be tacky. Then I had a v600 scanner that developed a purple line through every single scan I made with it. Contacted epson and they said it was dust on the flatbed, and was normal - within spec. Wouldn't help unless I paid for a service. I cleaned it in every way imaginable and could never get rid of that stupid line. If you look up 'epson line through scans' on google you'll find thousands of people with the same problem - they just keep making scanners that do this.

I bought a $100 canon ipf4850 which is a crappy cheap inkjet and it's better designed than both the epsons I had despite being 1/10th the price. Not only that, but color prints out of it are nearly perfect straight out of the box, and b&w are similar in quality, despite the obvious defect in features. The 9500 MKII printer in particular is designed and built really nicely IMO - much nicer than my r1900.

Also I used to work for a large printer/photocopier sales and service place in QLD - the canon commercial graphics printers and copiers (20K-50K each) were incredibly good machines - much better than most of the competition.
 
Pablito said:
I have owned maybe a dozen inkjet printers, probably more. Used heavily. The Epson 3880 is simply the best one I've ever worked with, MUCH better than any of the other Epsons and FAR FAR better than any of the Canons, which tended to clog up a lot more. The 3880 is a remarkable printer that not only produces stunning results but lets you change the ink cartridge mid-print! Currently, I have a 3880 in my studio and two more of them for my students.
Click to expand...

How do you quantify "FAR FAR better" :)
Just wondering...
 
dasuess said:
Ordered mine directly from epson.com and received it in less than a week as I recall. It's $650 after the $200 mail-in rebate and I'm still waiting for mine, but it's only been a few weeks since I sent it in.
Click to expand...

Now the 3000 is just $650 up front. Epson is the only company I have actually received a rebate from. I think everyone else disguises their rebate checks as junk mail with no indication who sent it and I ended up throwing them away without opening them.
 
shadowfox said:
How do you quantify "FAR FAR better" :)
Just wondering...
Click to expand...

To me, my Epson printers give me great prints exactly as I though they were going to look and no problems with the printer. I have not had a clogged nozzle in the six years I have been using Epson 2400s.

I know that others have their brand favorites and I certainly would not try to convince them they are wrong.
 
Bob Michaels said:
Now the 3000 is just $650 up front. Epson is the only company I have actually received a rebate from. I think everyone else disguises their rebate checks as junk mail with no indication who sent it and I ended up throwing them away without opening them.
Click to expand...

How quickly things change. I ordered my R3000 barely a month ago and it was $849 with a $200 mail-in rebate. Just checked and as you said, it's now $649 straight up with no rebate. And still free shipping!! And it's a fabulous printer to boot...
 
I love my 3880. I got rid of my 2200 several years ago, in disgust (clogged heads, etc) and used online services until I bought a 3880 a little over a year ago. I have been delighted with it, and the way the prints look and the ink lasts. Never a clog or other problem (and I live in an area where 10% humidity is high). I don't think I could go back to a smaller printer (tho, as Bob says, YMMV).

Rick
 
sepiareverb said:
I too love the 3880, but have not used the R3000. Inks do last and last, I print a fair bit for various people and have only changed 3 cartridges over about 2 years. Likely 50% of the prints I've done (numbers not square inches) are 17x22"- I've gone through at least 150 sheets of that paper.
Click to expand...

Awesome! That is quite a lot of printing on the cartridges.
 
gavinlg said:
Epson r1800 and r1900 that clogged heads, were difficult to get a good print out of, built like crap (imo) and just generally found the design and function to be tacky. Then I had a v600 scanner that developed a purple line through every single scan I made with it. Contacted epson and they said it was dust on the flatbed, and was normal - within spec. Wouldn't help unless I paid for a service. I cleaned it in every way imaginable and could never get rid of that stupid line. If you look up 'epson line through scans' on google you'll find thousands of people with the same problem - they just keep making scanners that do this.

I bought a $100 canon ipf4850 which is a crappy cheap inkjet and it's better designed than both the epsons I had despite being 1/10th the price. Not only that, but color prints out of it are nearly perfect straight out of the box, and b&w are similar in quality, despite the obvious defect in features. The 9500 MKII printer in particular is designed and built really nicely IMO - much nicer than my r1900.

Also I used to work for a large printer/photocopier sales and service place in QLD - the canon commercial graphics printers and copiers (20K-50K each) were incredibly good machines - much better than most of the competition.
Click to expand...

Oof. Doesn't sound like you have had a good experience at all. :(
 
Bob Michaels said:
To me, my Epson printers give me great prints exactly as I though they were going to look and no problems with the printer. I have not had a clogged nozzle in the six years I have been using Epson 2400s.

I know that others have their brand favorites and I certainly would not try to convince them they are wrong.
Click to expand...

Thanks Bob, for sharing your experiences.
 
Zonan said:
I love my 3880. I got rid of my 2200 several years ago, in disgust (clogged heads, etc) and used online services until I bought a 3880 a little over a year ago. I have been delighted with it, and the way the prints look and the ink lasts. Never a clog or other problem (and I live in an area where 10% humidity is high). I don't think I could go back to a smaller printer (tho, as Bob says, YMMV).

Rick
Click to expand...

The DC area seems to vary between relatively dry and downright swampy. :p

Seems like the general feeling is, if going for an epson printer, go for the 3880.
 
The 3880 is the first inkjet that I haven't eventually hated. Never clogs, does beautiful BW if you invest in making QTR profiles. Excellent colour as well, but I mostly print BW. On balance, I might even say that I like it a lot.

Kirk
 
KEH said:
The 3880 is the first inkjet that I haven't eventually hated. Never clogs, does beautiful BW if you invest in making QTR profiles. Excellent colour as well, but I mostly print BW. On balance, I might even say that I like it a lot.

Kirk
Click to expand...

Hi Kirk,
I assume QTR is quad tone rip?
 
Maybe the 3000 and 3800 have better mechanism than 2200 or 2400 or 1800.

My experience with those three mirrors some of the frustrations you see in this thread.

Now I'm happy with my Canon 9500 Mk II.
 
shadowfox said:
How do you quantify "FAR FAR better" :)
Just wondering...
Click to expand...

The Canons clogged all the time, used much more ink, the Canon Mac driver software was much more fussy, the inks faded visibly under normal room light, the inks were harder to find, etc.

This turned me off the Canons and now I find the Epson 3880 to be astounding, even lets you change inks in the middle of doing a print.

I admit however, that I don't closely follow all the latest developments so the newer Canons may be greatly improved, I just don't know. My experience is with older Canons. From what I understand Canon has been using pigment inks now for a while. I have no experience with those.
 
david.elliott said:
Thanks Will. I'm going to look into that option too. It would save me a fair amount of money. :p
Click to expand...

Sure David.
It's wise to look at all options.
Here's a review of the Canon that I found useful when I was in your position:

http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/reviews/printer/canon_pixma_9500_mk2.html

Also one thing that hasn't been mentioned, Canon "pro" printers has user-replaceable printing heads.
So if you do have a non-flushable ink clog, you still have the option to get a new head, rather than a whole new printer.
 
shadowfox said:
Sure David.
It's wise to look at all options.
Here's a review of the Canon that I found useful when I was in your position:

http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/reviews/printer/canon_pixma_9500_mk2.html

Also one thing that hasn't been mentioned, Canon "pro" printers has user-replaceable printing heads.
So if you do have a non-flushable ink clog, you still have the option to get a new head, rather than a whole new printer.
Click to expand...

Thanks Will. That is a very detailed review!
 
As per as my best experiences Epson has added another A3+ printer the R3000. This is not a replacement to the much-loved R2880, but comes in addition to Epson's professional line up that includes the R3880 A2 printer. The R3000 is aimed both at the professional and advanced hobbyist photographer who may want to produce a short print runs or limited edition prints. if want buy Empty Printer Cartridges so we refers so many buyers and suppliers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom