alphonse2501
Established
Last month I took my OM-1 with Sigma 24mm f2.8 Macro to Sierra Nevada for field trip. Used three rolls of Fujifilm color negative 24/400. At last roll I changed to OM 35mm f2.8. Now I get my negatives with scanned CD and I am shocking for the result:
Sigma 24mm f2.8 Macro
http://i.imgur.com/PoMAzzR.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/MKuAfnx.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/XCpWb4n.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/s5zpmW2.jpg
OM 35mm f2.8
http://i.imgur.com/rvitDHn.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/ngxwfdQ.jpg
Both of images appears blur on center to left side of picture. I suspect there have something on lens that caused blur. Since right side of frame appears focus is right, only I can assume are:
1. axis of glasses are off, and
2. glasses contamination.
First is possible because there has crack on focus ring, but OM 35mm lens too? Not sure
Second also possible too after I checked 24mm lens again by flashlight, some surface mark/haze on outside and inside of glasses. OM 35mm lens looks like it has haze too, however, can haze create partial blur? I am not know.
Do there have any explanation for this partial blurry? All of my frames have it.
Sigma 24mm f2.8 Macro
http://i.imgur.com/PoMAzzR.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/MKuAfnx.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/XCpWb4n.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/s5zpmW2.jpg
OM 35mm f2.8
http://i.imgur.com/rvitDHn.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/ngxwfdQ.jpg
Both of images appears blur on center to left side of picture. I suspect there have something on lens that caused blur. Since right side of frame appears focus is right, only I can assume are:
1. axis of glasses are off, and
2. glasses contamination.
First is possible because there has crack on focus ring, but OM 35mm lens too? Not sure
Second also possible too after I checked 24mm lens again by flashlight, some surface mark/haze on outside and inside of glasses. OM 35mm lens looks like it has haze too, however, can haze create partial blur? I am not know.
Do there have any explanation for this partial blurry? All of my frames have it.