aad
Not so new now.
So I pointed my Elmar at the moon last night and noticed a small misalignment when focused at infinity.
I dove in to all the information on adjustment-then I stopped.
At great distance, the rangefinder mechanism is at its least accurate-fortunate, because focus is least critical. At short distance, it is at its highest accuracy.
(Note that by accurate I mean repeatable)
When we adjust the rangefinder at close distance, however, we can only verify that the lens marking is accurate.
I also have read several instruction sets explaining how to adjust at both (near) infinity and at 4 feet-but there is only one screw. If you're set at one point, the rest of the focus accuracy is determined by the lens cam.
So-wouldn't it be best to measure precision at a close distance and let infinity determine itself? Or even better, check by photograph, aligning the rangefinder on a given object then chcking for focus-and ignore markings altogether?
For what it's worth, I've never had a question about focus-even wide open with a Nokton, it seems ok.
Comments?
I dove in to all the information on adjustment-then I stopped.
At great distance, the rangefinder mechanism is at its least accurate-fortunate, because focus is least critical. At short distance, it is at its highest accuracy.
(Note that by accurate I mean repeatable)
When we adjust the rangefinder at close distance, however, we can only verify that the lens marking is accurate.
I also have read several instruction sets explaining how to adjust at both (near) infinity and at 4 feet-but there is only one screw. If you're set at one point, the rest of the focus accuracy is determined by the lens cam.
So-wouldn't it be best to measure precision at a close distance and let infinity determine itself? Or even better, check by photograph, aligning the rangefinder on a given object then chcking for focus-and ignore markings altogether?
For what it's worth, I've never had a question about focus-even wide open with a Nokton, it seems ok.
Comments?