Redface Photomic Finder

CameraQuest said:
Customs made them remove Nikon from the front plate
looks like they replaced it with red leather or vinyl ?
Click to expand...

Thanks, Stephan. I didn't think about that until I looked at the lens again. The red part is name-tag plastic which has a white center so that when routed it shows through.

PF
 
My brother dealt with a private Japanese exporter expert in selling Nikons to customers in the United States. He carefully covered the words "nippon" and "Nikkor" on the beauty ring with a clear tape, then black painted over the tape. The same for the mark on the camera. The TN finder front plate was removed and shipped separately. Camera and lens slipped through without a problem. On receipt of same, one pulled off the tape and took the paint with it. Screwed the plate back on and you would never know it was a shadow import. cheers, WES
 
Fuchs said:
Is this the same reason behind the "Nikomat" instead of "Nikkormat" nameplate on some early cameras?
Click to expand...

No - that was Zeiss Ikon. Zeiss considered the "ikon" in Nikon a trademark violation, and Nikomat a violation of Ikomat (their projector branding), and frequently went to court over it. In Germany, where courts were the most Zeiss friendly, Nikon never offered their rangefinders at all, and there as well as in some other European countries the F went by "Nikkor F" until the early seventies. For the consumer cameras, Nikon did not even attempt exports by the domestic Nikomat branding, but renamed the export versions to Nikkormat throughout...
 
farlymac said:
Thanks, Stephan. I didn't think about that until I looked at the lens again. The red part is name-tag plastic which has a white center so that when routed it shows through.
Click to expand...

I suppose it was originally black, and the blue part of the pigment has faded, leaving only red...
 
sevo said:
No - that was Zeiss Ikon. Zeiss considered the "ikon" in Nikon a trademark violation, and Nikomat a violation of Ikomat (their projector branding), and frequently went to court over it. In Germany, where courts were the most Zeiss friendly, Nikon never offered their rangefinders at all, and there as well as in some other European countries the F went by "Nikkor F" until the early seventies. For the consumer cameras, Nikon did not even attempt exports by the domestic Nikomat branding, but renamed the export versions to Nikkormat throughout...
Click to expand...
Thank you for the info, Sevo.
 
sevo said:
No - that was Zeiss Ikon. Zeiss considered the "ikon" in Nikon a trademark violation, and Nikomat a violation of Ikomat (their projector branding), and frequently went to court over it. In Germany, where courts were the most Zeiss friendly, Nikon never offered their rangefinders at all, and there as well as in some other European countries the F went by "Nikkor F" until the early seventies. For the consumer cameras, Nikon did not even attempt exports by the domestic Nikomat branding, but renamed the export versions to Nikkormat throughout...
Click to expand...

The same trademark regs were involved when Leitz challenged Olympus' import of their new M-1 forcing a name change from the M-1 used initially in Japan to OM-1 when it was exported to other markets in North America and Europe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom