Ok, so this may be the mother of all bad ideas, but when I was assembling a cheapo set for my 8-year-old to practice with (a $25 N2020 and 50mm), it occurred to me that 1980s AF is not really that bad compared to using a rangefinder. In fact, it's slightly faster.
Then I got to, hey, F4s are really cheap. And not so huge with the MB-20. And then action finder...
But then, I thought hey, I have this CLE and 40 that I just don't use (I like digital Ms better); should I replace the teeny Minolta with an F6? Because, you know, final 35mm camera.
But seriously, my memory is fuzzy on the F4 (it's probably been 10 years since I've owned one) and nonexistent on the F6. How bad/good are these as cameras with a basic 50 or 35-105 IF?
Dante
Of those choices, unless you need the pro features of the F4 or F6,
I would buy one FM2 and one FE-2
both are much smaller and CLE like
and use the extra $ to buy more classic cameras

