cassel
Well-known
Well, I would definitely recommend the 1B - great quality and view without much investment! The IIIC gets all of the attention.😉
Last batch of results to share this week - this time it's Tri-X from the Retina IB. (not sure why all of my previous images disappeared🙁)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This is what Ivor Matanle said about what I expect was the last model of Retina B:
"Looking very much like a Retina IIIC is this Retina IB (Stuttgart Type 019), introduced in 1957. This has a five-element 50mm f / 2.8 Retina-Xenar lens of very high quality in a Synchro Compur shutter, but no rangefinder. The exposure meter is similar to that in a Retina IIIC."
As a fan of four element Tessar and Xenar lenses I was always curious about this five element lens and Retina 1Bs, but have never bought one.
All Xenar lenses on the Retinas have four elements. The pre-war 2,8/50 Xenon has five elements and is a "Xenar" with an extra element.
I was curious about this myself, but indeed the Retina-Xenar on the 1b and 1B are 5-element lenses, apparently. A couple of Retina guides say this, and I've found corroboration from sites online (I know, could be circular citations). I would really like to see a block diagram -- I think the images in this link show a certain quality that makes me think there is indeed an additional lens element. I gather Schneider made the 5-element Xenar for other cameras too (Wirgin for one).
The Xenon is a 6-element lens, I believe.